Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did president trump order that nursing be removed as a profession
Executive summary
The U.S. Department of Education, under the Trump administration’s implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, has changed which graduate programs it counts as “professional degree” programs — and that revised list excludes nursing programs such as MSN and DNP, which affects eligibility for higher loan caps formerly available to some graduate/professional students (reports cite the change and warnings from nursing groups) [1] [2] [3]. Multiple news outlets, nursing organizations and fact-checkers report the change is part of a larger overhaul of federal student-loan rules that eliminated the Grad PLUS program and set new borrowing caps tied to the narrower “professional” definition [4] [3].
1. What actually changed: a technical redefinition, not a renaming of the profession
The immediate action reported is a Department of Education change to the federal regulatory definition of “professional degree” programs used to set student-loan eligibility and caps; nursing graduate programs (MSN, DNP and some post-baccalaureate nursing credentials) were among the credentials the department announced it would no longer classify as “professional” under the new scheme [3] [2]. Coverage frames this as part of implementing President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which also eliminated the Grad PLUS loan program and established different aggregate borrowing limits for “professional” students versus other graduate students [1] [4].
2. Why this matters to students and health care employers: money, access, and career pipelines
Because the new definition ties higher aggregate loan caps (such as the $200,000 cap previously available to those in programs labeled “professional”) to a shorter list of programs, students in excluded nursing programs will face lower federal borrowing limits and the loss of the Grad PLUS option — changes nursing groups warn could reduce the number of nurses able to fund advanced practice and leadership degrees, with downstream effects on access to care, especially in rural and underserved communities [4] [5]. Reporters and nursing organizations quoted in the coverage describe the shift as increasing tuition burden for advanced nursing training and potentially constraining workforce supply [6] [5].
3. Who is raising alarms — and what are they saying?
Major nursing organizations and academic nursing leaders have publicly criticized the reclassification, calling it “devastating” or “deeply concerning” and urging Education Secretary Linda McMahon and undersecretary officials to reconsider the choice to exclude nursing from the professional-degree category [7] [2] [4]. Local and national outlets relay statements stressing that advanced practice registered nurses often provide essential care where physicians are scarce, and that the funding changes could make advanced training less attainable [5] [7].
4. Opposing or supporting perspectives visible in reporting
Coverage shows two distinct lenses: critics present the rule change as a blunt funding cut that threatens health-care capacity and career advancement for nurses [4] [5]; other outlets and commentary frame the moves as part of a broader policy to restructure student-loan programs and limit graduate borrowing after Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, pointing out the department’s administrative role in defining program categories under the law [1] [3]. Available sources do not mention strong public defense from Education Department officials explaining the exclusion in detail; most accounts focus on effects and reaction [1] [3].
5. Where fact-checkers weigh in and what they confirm
Snopes and mainstream outlets inspected the online rumor that the Education Department had reclassified nursing and other programs; their reporting confirms that in late November 2025 the department proposed removing several credentials, including nursing and others like social work and public health, from the list of “professional degrees” for loan-cap purposes — and that this follows statutory changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act which changed loan eligibility and caps for graduate/professional students [3] [4].
6. Limitations, unanswered questions and what to watch next
Available sources document the administrative redefinition and the likely impact on borrowing but do not provide exhaustive detail on transitional rules, exact implementation timelines beyond “next summer” in some reports, or whether subsequent guidance, appeals or legal challenges will alter outcomes [2] [3]. Also, available reporting does not include a detailed, published justification from Secretary McMahon’s office explaining why nursing was excluded rather than other professions — a rationale that could clarify intent but is not cited in the files provided [1] [3].
7. Bottom line for readers
The change is not that “nursing” as an occupation was abolished or renamed; it is an administrative reclassification affecting which graduate programs qualify for higher federal loan limits and the now-eliminated Grad PLUS support — a technical policy move with substantial financial and workforce implications, widely criticized by nursing groups and confirmed by multiple news and fact-checking outlets [2] [3] [4].