Did trump take a 100 million bride
Executive summary
Allegations that Donald Trump accepted a $10 million cash bribe from Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah el‑Sisi stem from Washington Post reporting and prompted House Democrats to open inquiries; reporting focuses on a near‑$10 million cash withdrawal from a state‑run Egyptian bank around the 2016 election and a contemporaneous $10 million “loan” to Trump’s campaign [1] [2]. Other widely circulated claims — including a $100 million bribe or a $400 million plane from Qatar — appear in partisan statements and advocacy actions but are reported differently across sources [3] [4].
1. What the core allegation is and where it came from
The central allegation reported in 2024 is that U.S. intelligence and FBI investigators learned of a nearly $10 million cash withdrawal from Egypt’s state bank in late 2016 and a tip that Egyptian intelligence sought to get that cash to Trump’s campaign; the Washington Post’s reporting on that FBI inquiry triggered congressional letters and oversight demands [1] [2] [5].
2. What investigators reportedly found (and what they didn’t)
According to reporting cited by Democrats, investigators saw records that the National Bank of Egypt carried out a withdrawal of roughly $9,998,000 packed into two large bags of $100 bills days before Trump’s inauguration; the FBI treated that tip as credible enough to open a probe, per the Washington Post recounting cited by congressional Democrats [2] [5]. Available sources do not mention a definitive chain-of-custody showing that money reached Trump personally or his campaign coffers.
3. Official reactions and congressional oversight
House Oversight Democrats publicly demanded answers and launched an investigation, asking Trump to provide proof he did not receive Egyptian money and criticizing alleged obstruction of the inquiry by Trump‑appointed DOJ officials [1] [2]. Democratic leaders also linked the reporting to broader concerns about conflicts of interest and foreign influence; their public statements frame the matter as urgent oversight, not a closed criminal finding [3] [6].
4. Where the “$100 million” or other large dollar figures come from
Claims about vastly larger payoffs — for example a $400 million Qatari plane or invocation of a “$100 million” bribe — appear in advocacy and partisan press releases seeking congressional action and in opinion pieces that stitch together multiple controversies; these sources present political arguments and interpretations rather than a single verified payment traceable to Trump [3] [4]. The specific $100 million figure is not documented in the investigative reporting cited by the congressional letters in the available sources; therefore, available sources do not mention a confirmed $100 million cash bribe to Trump.
5. Media and opinion responses — multiple perspectives
Opinion writers and advocacy groups have characterized the reporting as evidence of the “largest foreign bribe” in modern history or part of a pattern of pay‑to‑play behavior, while congressional Democrats treat the Post’s reporting as the basis for formal oversight [5] [3] [4]. Other outlets and sources in the provided set emphasize circumstantial gaps — for instance, lack of bank records directly tied to Trump’s accounts — and note that DOJ decisions and statute‑of‑limitations issues limited prosecution prospects [5].
6. What remains unproven and limits of current reporting
The existing public reporting documents a credible tip, a large cash withdrawal in Cairo, and a contemporaneous $10 million loan listed by Trump; it does not publicly produce an unbroken evidentiary trail proving that the cash left Egypt and was handed to Trump or his campaign, nor does it show a criminal conviction tied to that alleged exchange [5] [2]. Available sources do not mention conclusive bank records or courtroom findings that establish beyond doubt that Trump received a $10 million cash bribe.
7. Why this matters politically and legally
If true, the allegation would raise questions about foreign contributions to U.S. campaigns and potential corruption; Democrats argue missing DOJ follow‑through and alleged shielding by political appointees require oversight [1] [2]. Critics of the reporting caution that circumstantial evidence and investigative shortfalls mean readers should distinguish credible leads from proven crimes — a point voiced in the media pieces that call for renewed inquiry rather than pronouncement [5].
8. Bottom line for readers
Reporting to date documents a highly suspicious $10 million cash withdrawal in Egypt coinciding with Trump’s listed $10 million campaign loan and has prompted formal congressional questions [1] [2]. Available sources do not confirm a $100 million cash bribe and do not show an incontrovertible, court‑proven transfer of Egyptian cash to Trump; the matter remains the subject of oversight, partisan framing, and unresolved factual gaps [5] [2].