Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Do Proud Boys Run the Internet
Executive summary
Available reporting does not support the claim that the Proud Boys “run the internet”; however, multiple sources show the group has effectively used online platforms for organization, recruitment and propaganda, shifting between mainstream removals and activity on alternative services [1] [2] [3]. Courts and law enforcement link Proud Boys leadership to real-world violence (including Jan. 6) even as chapters and online channels continue to persist and rebuild [4] [5].
1. The slogan vs. the evidence: “Run the internet” is rhetorical, not literal
No source in the record asserts that the Proud Boys control internet infrastructure, major platforms, or search ecosystems; instead the evidence describes them as highly active users and organizers on social media and messaging apps, exploiting memes and alternative platforms to amplify their brand [1] [2] [3]. Claims that they “run” the internet conflate influence, visibility and tactical use of online tools with ownership or operational control — a distinction not supported by the available reporting [1] [3].
2. How the Proud Boys leverage online culture and platforms
Researchers and analysts document that Proud Boys channels have been central to creating iconography, ironic language and memes that obscure extremist content, and that social media and messaging apps (notably Telegram and alternative sites) have played a crucial role in their organizing and recruitment [1] [6] [3]. After moments of mainstream attention, their Telegram viewership rose, showing that publicity—intentional or incidental—translates into online reach even when major platforms remove them [3].
3. Platform bans, migration and cross‑pollination
Mainstream platforms have banned Proud Boys pages at various times (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube are cited), prompting migration to alternative services where moderation is lighter and cross-pollination with other far‑right communities increases [7] [8] [3]. Reporting by Reuters and others documents chapters recruiting and coordinating online while also trying to move into mainstream politics and local offices, showing a multi-pronged strategy rather than technical domination of the internet [5] [8].
4. Online activity produces offline consequences
Academic work correlates spikes in Proud Boys’ online motivational and prognostic framing with increased likelihood of offline mobilization, supporting the view that their internet presence has concrete, sometimes violent, real‑world effects [6]. The Department of Justice links online coordination and leadership messages to the U.S. Capitol breach and subsequent seditious-conspiracy convictions, underscoring that their online networks have been operationally significant for violent action [4].
5. Organizational resilience: rebuilding on and off the net
Investigations find the movement splintered yet persistent: chapters expanded to dozens of states and multiple countries based on monitoring of social media activity, and leaders have stated aims to pivot toward electoral politics and local organizing while continuing to run digital shows and channels [5] [8]. The ADL and other monitors document continued extremist content and online campaigns, including violent rhetoric and fantasies circulated in Proud Boys spaces [9].
6. Competing perspectives and potential agendas
Security researchers, NGOs and law-enforcement-adjacent sources portray the Proud Boys as an online-savvy extremist group whose digital operations amplify violence and recruitment [1] [9] [5]. Some commentary in conservative or sympathetic circles has framed them as mischaracterized or as a political subculture; Reuters and Rolling Stone reporting note deliberate attempts by leaders to mainstream the brand and reframe negative coverage [8] [5]. Be aware that pieces aiming to sanitize or politicize the group’s image may advance political agendas tied to parties or candidates [8].
7. What’s not in the reporting (and why it matters)
Available sources do not document technical control of internet infrastructure, platform ownership, or systemic manipulation of search and hosting at the level implied by “run the internet” — the coverage instead shows tactical use, migration, and influence [1] [3] [5]. Similarly, the record does not quantify the net size of their digital audience compared to other political actors; absence of such metrics cautions against hyperbolic statements about dominance [3].
8. Bottom line for readers
The Proud Boys are a digitally adept, politically active extremist group that uses social media and messaging platforms to recruit, radicalize and coordinate, and their online presence has translated into documented offline harm and political ambitions [1] [6] [4] [5]. But “running the internet” overstates the case: available reporting shows influence and persistence, not ownership or control of the internet’s systems [3] [2].