Which doctors have evaluated Donald Trump's cognitive health and what did they report?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
President Donald Trump’s most recently disclosed cognitive evaluation was conducted under the supervision of his White House physician, Captain Sean Barbabella, who reported that Trump scored 30/30 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and was in “excellent cognitive and physical health” [1] [2]. Trump himself has repeatedly said he “aced” multiple cognitive tests and boasted about perfect marks from “top doctors,” while outside physicians and commentators continue to call for more transparency and question whether brief screening tests alone are sufficient to assess complex cognitive function [3] [4] [5].
1. Who officially evaluated Trump’s cognition and what did they report
The clearest, named medical evaluator in the recent disclosures is White House physician Captain Sean Barbabella, who released a Walter Reed report stating that Trump “exhibits excellent cognitive and physical health” and noting a 30/30 score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [2] [1]. The White House memo and media summaries framed the MoCA score and the broader physical exam as evidence that Trump is “fully fit” to serve as commander-in-chief [1] [2]. The White House press office also released MRI and imaging summaries described publicly as showing no acute or chronic concerns in cardiovascular and abdominal imaging, language conveyed by the press secretary when discussing the examination overseen by the White House medical team [6].
2. What Trump and his team have said about the tests
Trump has repeatedly told audiences and posted on social platforms that he “aced” cognitive exams and that multiple doctors gave him “perfect marks,” framing the tests as decisive vindication of his mental fitness [3] [4]. The White House released the specific MoCA score and a physician’s concluding language in April 2025 to rebut public questions about his health and to provide what the administration called “transparency” about the exams administered at Walter Reed [1] [6].
3. Independent or external evaluations and public calls for testing
Beyond the White House medical team’s release, there is no sourced reporting in the documents provided identifying an independent, external neurologist or neuropsychologist who administered or certified those same MoCA results; some outside experts and public figures have urged more extensive testing and full medical disclosure [7] [1]. Neuropsychologist and academic voices (for example, those urging Alzheimer’s screening) appear in commentary calling for comprehensive evaluation, but the reporting here does not document an independent clinician conducting and publishing a separate cognitive exam [7].
4. Limits of the tests and dissenting viewpoints
Medical experts cited in these reports note that brief screening tools like the MoCA can rule out obvious impairment due to stroke or moderate dementia but are not designed to be exhaustive measures of cognitive complexity or intelligence; critics argue that a perfect MoCA score does not eliminate subtler cognitive concerns and that more detailed neuropsychological batteries would be necessary to detect nuanced deficits [5] [8]. Political and media actors have framed the disclosures differently: the White House presents the results as definitive, while some journalists, doctors’ open letters, and commentators call for broader transparency and more complete records to answer lingering questions about age-related decline [1] [5].
5. What remains unverified in reporting
The public record assembled here confirms the White House medical team’s testing and the release of a MoCA score by Sean Barbabella, and it records Trump’s own repeated claims about “acing” multiple cognitive tests [2] [3]. The sources do not, however, provide documentation of additional named outside neurologists or neuropsychologists undertaking independent evaluations whose reports are publicly available, nor do they provide full raw cognitive testing data or extended neuropsychological assessments beyond the MoCA and the summarized Walter Reed exam [7] [1]. That gap underpins continuing debate over whether those disclosures are sufficient to settle public questions about cognitive fitness.