What documented lies has Donald Trump made while in office and after leaving office?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Donald Trump’s record of false or misleading statements is well-documented: fact‑checking projects counted 30,573 false or misleading claims over his first four years in office (The Washington Post) [1]. Media and fact‑check outlets have continued to catalogue specific falsehoods during his return to the White House in 2025, including repeated inaccurate claims about inflation, the 2020 election, and policy achievements [2] [3] [4].
1. A mountains‑high tally: The Washington Post’s 30,573 figure
The most comprehensive, frequently cited measure of Trump’s recorded falsehoods comes from The Washington Post Fact Checker, which documented 30,573 false or misleading claims during his 2017–2021 presidency and has been used widely as a benchmark for his dishonesty record [1] [5]. That database counted one inaccurate claim per topic per venue and was repeatedly cited in news coverage and congressional materials [6] [7].
2. Themes, not just numbers: What the tallies capture
Reporters and fact‑checkers show patterns in the claims: repeated “big lie” assertions about the 2020 election; exaggerated or false policy wins (trade with China, “ending wars,” inflation numbers); and a steady stream of smaller inaccuracies that build a larger impression of unreliability [8] [9] [10]. The Washington Post project and news outlets emphasize frequency and repetition as part of the political effect, not merely isolated errors [1] [10].
3. Returning to office in 2025: Fresh rounds of documented falsehoods
During and after Trump’s return to the White House in January 2025, mainstream outlets documented numerous new false or misleading claims: for example, assertions that prices and grocery costs were down despite official data showing overall prices higher year‑over‑year, and repeated false claims about the scale of his electoral mandate and youth vote [2] [11]. The Guardian and local fact‑checks highlighted falsehoods in his inaugural and early speeches, including misstatements about prosecutions and policy origins [3] [12].
4. High‑profile false claims repeatedly flagged by fact‑checkers
Fact‑checking organizations like CNN, NBC, FactCheck.org and PolitiFact continue to list specific false claims: Trump’s recurring claim that “we have no inflation” or that inflation is under 2% was debunked by reporters using recent CPI figures [4] [2]. His claims about taking hundreds of billions “from China” via tariffs, or having “got out of every war,” were repeatedly corrected by CNN and other outlets [9] [8]. PolitiFact also spotlighted dramatic statements such as alleged lives saved by “knocking out” boats off Venezuela as reader‑notable falsehoods [13].
5. Institutional and political responses: cataloguing vs. contention
The extensive catalogues have political uses: critics and Democratic officials cite them to argue Trump erodes institutions and facts [3] [14]. Supporters often dispute methodologies—arguing that tallying every misleading turn of phrase inflates the problem—or emphasize policy outcomes instead (not found in current reporting). Reuters and Brookings pieces document downstream consequences such as retribution campaigns and political fallout that occur alongside the misinformation debates [15] [16].
6. Limits of the record and the need for source‑specific scrutiny
Large counts tell only part of the story: they quantify frequency but not intent or impact per claim; fact‑check databases apply specific counting rules (one claim per topic per venue) that shape totals [7] [5]. Individual fact checks are essential to judge severity—some falsehoods are tactical exaggerations, others (like the “big lie” about 2020) had demonstrable institutional consequences, as reported by ABC and NBC [17] [10].
7. Competing narratives and why it matters
Mainstream fact‑checkers and outlets uniformly document a high volume of false claims [1] [9], while political allies frame reporting as partisan—an argument referenced in campaign‑era pushback but not detailed in the supplied sources (“not found in current reporting” on methodological rebuttals). The evidence in these sources shows repeated, documented misstatements spanning policy, economics and electoral legitimacy that shaped public debate and institutional responses [1] [3] [4].
Conclusion: multiple independent fact‑checking projects and news organizations have documented extensive, repeated false or misleading statements from Donald Trump both during his first presidency and after his return to office in 2025; the most cited single metric is the 30,573 count from The Washington Post’s Fact Checker [1], and subsequent coverage continues to catalogue high‑profile falsehoods and their political effects [3] [4].