Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Which political party has the highest rate of domestic terrorism?

Checked on September 18, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided suggest that domestic terrorism is increasingly motivated by partisan politics, with a significant rise in attacks and plots against government targets since 2016 [1] [2]. While the sources do not directly compare the rates of domestic terrorism between different political parties, they highlight the threat of right-wing extremism, particularly from white supremacists [3]. Some analyses imply that right-wing groups may have a higher rate of domestic terrorism, with one source suggesting that right-wing ideologies have fueled more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terrorism plots in the United States since 2002 [4]. Key factors driving domestic terrorism include conspiracy theories, election denialism, and identity-based partisan division [1] [2] [5]. The organization of anti-government terrorists has changed, with more incidents involving radicalized individuals with no material ties to any group [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A crucial aspect missing from the original statement is the definition of domestic terrorism and how it is measured [1] [2]. The sources provided do not offer a clear distinction between different types of domestic terrorism or how the rates are calculated. Additionally, the analyses primarily focus on right-wing extremism, with limited discussion on left-wing or other forms of extremism [3] [4]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the role of mental health or socioeconomic factors in driving domestic terrorism, are not explored in the provided analyses [6] [7]. Furthermore, the sources do not provide an international context or comparison to assess the uniqueness of the situation in the United States [6].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or biased by implying that one political party has a higher rate of domestic terrorism without providing clear evidence or context [1] [2]. The sources suggest that domestic terrorism is a complex issue, driven by various factors, including partisan politics, conspiracy theories, and identity-based division [1] [2] [5]. Right-wing groups or individuals may benefit from the lack of clear evidence or context, as it allows them to downplay their involvement in domestic terrorism [3] [4]. On the other hand, left-wing or liberal groups may benefit from emphasizing the threat of right-wing extremism, as it supports their narrative of a growing threat from conservative or nationalist ideologies [4] [5]. Ultimately, a nuanced understanding of domestic terrorism requires considering multiple perspectives and factors, rather than oversimplifying the issue or attributing it to a single political party [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What are the most common ideologies behind domestic terrorism in the US?
How do law enforcement agencies track and categorize domestic terrorism incidents?
Which political party has been associated with the most violent extremist groups since 2020?
What role does social media play in the radicalization of domestic terrorists?
How do FBI statistics on domestic terrorism compare to those of private research organizations?