Have any criminal charges or indictments accused Donald Trump of crimes involving minors?

Checked on December 18, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

No criminal indictment or charge accusing Donald J. Trump of crimes involving minors has been filed that is supported by verified reporting; multiple fact-checks and news outlets have debunked viral claims that prosecutors brought child rape, molestation, or settlements for crimes against children against Trump [1] [2] [3]. Social-media lists and posts alleging such charges have been repeatedly rated false by independent fact-checkers and news organizations, though civil claims and widely disputed allegations have circulated in other forums [1] [2] [3].

1. The core factual finding: prosecutors have not charged Trump with crimes involving minors

Authoritative fact-checkers examined viral allegations that Trump was facing criminal charges for child rape, molestation, or had made multiple settlements involving young children and found no evidence of criminal indictments on those grounds; Reuters reported that posts claiming prosecutors were reconsidering child-rape or molestation charges were false [3], Logically’s review concluded there are no rape charges involving minors against Trump [1], and PolitiFact found no proof for a circulated list alleging settlements for sex crimes against 10- to 13-year-olds [2].

2. Distinguishing criminal indictments from civil claims and rumors

Some public allegations have appeared in civil complaints, social-media lists, or third‑party reports, but the fact-check literature emphasizes the difference between a filed civil claim, an unproven allegation, and a criminal indictment; for example, a civil complaint referenced in reporting was dismissed for insufficient evidence, and fact-checkers flagged social-media lists as unsupported by court records or credible reporting [1] [2].

3. Why the stories spread: politics, aggregation, and shaky sourcing

Fact-checkers traced many of the claims to recycled blog posts, partisan aggregation, or anonymous “lists” that cite unreliable sources; PolitiFact noted a lineage back to partisan outlets or unverified tip sheets and concluded there was no corroborating documentary evidence for the alleged settlements involving minors [2], while Reuters mapped viral Facebook posts to false headlines and the absence of an AP report [3]. Those dynamics—political incentives to smear opponents, reuse of unverified material, and social amplification—help explain persistent false narratives.

4. What the sources explicitly do and do not say

The sources used here uniformly state there is no verified criminal charge or indictment alleging Trump committed crimes involving minors [1] [2] [3]. They do not claim that every allegation ever made in private accusations or civil filings is impossible; rather, their reporting documents that criminal prosecutors have not brought charges on those specific allegations and that public lists and viral posts lack evidentiary backing [1] [2].

5. Alternative viewpoints and institutional caveats

Some advocates and commentators insist investigations into Trump’s conduct should be broader or have suggested that other complaints could merit review; fact-checkers, however, limit their conclusions to what is demonstrably on the public record and note that criminal processes can evolve—but as of the documented reporting, no criminal indictments alleging crimes against minors were in evidence [3] [2]. It is also relevant that political actors on both sides have incentives to amplify or suppress such claims, a contextual factor noted in the fact-check reporting [2].

6. Bottom line and limits of this report

On the available, cited reporting, there are no criminal charges or indictments that accuse Donald Trump of crimes involving minors; fact-checkers and major news organizations have labeled viral claims to the contrary as false or unsubstantiated [1] [2] [3]. This analysis is confined to the sources provided and those sources’ public records and does not assert what prosecutors may investigate privately beyond documented filings and credible reporting [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What civil lawsuits have been filed alleging sexual misconduct by Donald Trump, and what were their outcomes?
How do major fact-checking organizations verify claims about high-profile legal cases involving politicians?
What mechanisms allow false criminal-accusation narratives to spread on social media, and who benefits from them?