Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Is there any real proof about donald trump and golden showers?

Checked on September 19, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The allegations of Donald Trump being involved in a "golden shower" incident at the Moscow Ritz-Carlton hotel originated from the Steele Dossier, which reported the claim as "salacious—and unproven" [1]. Donald Trump has denied these allegations, mentioning "four hookers" despite the Steele Dossier not specifying a number, raising questions among commentators [2]. Trump also claimed it was impossible because he is a "germaphobe" [3]. Some sources suggest that the "pee-tape" story in the Steele dossier was fabricated by Charles Dolan, a Democrat operative, to undermine Trump's campaign and presidency [4]. However, Christopher Steele, the author of the Steele dossier, defends the claims made in the dossier, including the "pee-tape" story, and believes that Russia likely retains "kompromat" against Trump [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key missing context is the lack of concrete evidence to support the allegations, with many sources noting that the claims are "unproven" [1]. Alternative viewpoints include the possibility that the "pee-tape" story was fabricated for political purposes [4], as well as the perspective that the story may be true, but the evidence has not been released [5]. Additionally, the fact that Donald Trump mentioned "four hookers" in his denial, despite the Steele Dossier not specifying a number, raises questions about the claim [2]. It is also important to consider the potential motivations of the sources, including Christopher Steele, who believes that Russia likely retains "kompromat" against Trump [5], and Charles Dolan, who is accused of fabricating the "pee-tape" story [4].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks if there is any "real proof" about Donald Trump and golden showers, which may imply that there is some credible evidence to support the allegations [1]. However, the majority of the sources suggest that the claims are "unproven" and "salacious" [1], and some even suggest that the story was fabricated for political purposes [4]. This framing may benefit those who want to undermine Trump's presidency, such as Democrat operatives [4], or those who want to defend Trump, such as his supporters who claim that the story is a hoax [3]. On the other hand, the lack of concrete evidence and the possibility of fabrication may also benefit Trump himself, as it allows him to deny the allegations and claim that they are part of a witch hunt [2] [3]. Ultimately, the potential misinformation and bias in the original statement may be influenced by the sources' motivations and perspectives, such as Christopher Steele's belief that Russia retains "kompromat" against Trump [5], or Charles Dolan's alleged fabrication of the "pee-tape" story [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the origin of the golden showers allegations against Donald Trump?
How did the Steele dossier contribute to the golden showers controversy?
What evidence supports or refutes the claims of Donald Trump's involvement in golden showers?
How did Donald Trump respond to the golden showers allegations during his presidency?
What role did the media play in perpetuating the golden showers scandal?