Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What is the cost of Donald Trump's golf trips to taxpayers in 2025?
1. Summary of the results
Based on the analyses provided, Donald Trump's golf trips in 2025 have cost American taxpayers at least $52-60 million [1] [2]. The most significant expense appears to be a five-day trip to Scotland that cost approximately $10 million [1] [3] [4] [2], with some sources citing the cost as $9.7 million [4].
Key findings include:
- Trump has made 99 visits to his properties, including 62 visits to his golf courses during his second term [5]
- The president has played golf on 23.4% of the days in his second term [2]
- Each trip to Mar-a-Lago is estimated to cost $3,383,250 [2]
- Much of the taxpayer money goes directly to Trump's businesses through lodging, security, and logistics expenses [1] [3]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The analyses reveal several important contextual elements missing from the original question:
- Historical comparison: Trump's first-term golfing expenses totaled $151.5 million in taxpayer-funded travel and security [4], providing perspective on current spending levels
- Business conflicts of interest: The analyses emphasize that these trips represent "presidential profiteering" where public funds directly benefit Trump's private business ventures [3] [5]
- Escalation pattern: Sources indicate Trump's "corruption is worse in his second term" with a "dramatic escalation of his presidential profiteering" [5]
Beneficiaries of downplaying these costs would include:
- Donald Trump and his family businesses, who receive direct financial benefit from taxpayer-funded stays at Trump properties
- Political supporters who might prefer to minimize scrutiny of presidential expenses
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original question itself appears neutral and factual, simply asking for cost information. However, the question's framing could potentially:
- Understate the scope by focusing only on 2025 costs without acknowledging the broader pattern of using taxpayer funds to benefit Trump's businesses [3] [5]
- Miss the ethical dimension highlighted in the analyses, which emphasize that these aren't just expensive trips but instances where "public coffers forward his and his family's private business ventures" [3]
The analyses consistently frame these expenses not merely as costly presidential travel, but as a systematic pattern of using government resources to benefit Trump's commercial interests [1] [3] [5].