What specific audio and video clips exist of Donald Trump making sexual comments about Ivanka, and where can they be verified?
Executive summary
There are a small number of audio and video moments, mostly from long‑ago radio and television appearances and later news compilations, in which Donald Trump made sexually suggestive remarks about his daughter Ivanka; the most frequently cited originals are Howard Stern Show appearances from the mid‑2000s and compilations or reporting by outlets that archived or excerpted them (CNN, BBC and multiple news sites) [1] [2] 2004-trump-agreed-his-daughter-was-a-piece-of-ass/" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[3] [4] [5]. Verification of these clips is possible by consulting the Stern show archives and contemporary news reports that published or described the material, though some excerpts have been removed from platform pages and some resurfaced clips prompted debate about context and authenticity [6] [1].
1. Howard Stern, mid‑2000s: the clearest audiovisual sources cited by multiple outlets
Several news outlets point to Howard Stern Show recordings—specifically appearances in 2004 and 2006—where Stern and co‑hosts asked crude questions about Ivanka and Trump responded with sexually suggestive affirmations or descriptions (for example agreeing she was a “piece of ass,” discussing her figure, or appearing to mouth “that’s true” after being called a sexual predator) [3] [1] [2]. These exchanges originally aired on Stern’s radio program and were later lifted, excerpted, or summarized by outlets such as CNN and multiple international papers when the material resurfaced; those outlets name the Howard Stern appearances as the primary source for the quoted or filmed remarks [4] [1].
2. Specific 2004 and 2006 moments reported and where they were shown
Reporting identifies a 2004 Stern exchange in which Stern called Ivanka a “piece of ass” and Trump agreed—this clip was widely circulated in reporting about his remarks [3]. A 2006 appearance is cited where Stern asked about Ivanka’s breasts and Trump commented about her being “voluptuous” and whether she’d had implants, and another 2006 excerpt resurfaced in which Trump appears to mouth “it’s true” or “that’s true” after someone labeled him a sexual predator while Ivanka laughed—news outlets re‑posting or describing that video include News18 and Hindustan Times [1] [2] [3].
3. Compilations and mainstream reporting that aggregate the clips
News organizations and compilations provide the most accessible verification for many readers: CNN produced video packages in 2016 cataloging sexually suggestive comments Trump made about Ivanka and others, and the BBC provided a full transcript of the separate 2005 Access Hollywood tape (which addressed lewd comments about women more broadly) that has been widely cited in parallel discussions of Trump’s conduct [4] [5]. These outlets’ pages or archives therefore serve as secondary verification when original broadcast clips are hard to find.
4. Platform removals, authenticity questions and journalistic limits
Some specific clips or full uploads have been removed from original hosting pages over the years, and resurfaced snippets sometimes prompted debate over authenticity or context; reporting about the 2006 Stern clip notes social media disputes about whether the mouthing was correctly interpreted, and articles flagged the resurfacing as prompting fresh outrage while also noting questions from viewers [1] [2] [6]. This reporting reflects a limitation: where primary broadcast archives are not publicly maintained, verification often relies on reputable news organizations’ archives and contemporaneous transcripts rather than a continuously available master file [1] [4].
5. Corroboration from books and contemporaneous witnesses
Beyond aired clips, books and memoirs from former aides and contemporaneous interviews have recounted similar behavior or remarks about Ivanka, including allegations that Trump made lewd comments about his daughter in the White House and was rebuked by staffers—these claims are reported in outlets covering such books and memoirs and serve as corroborative context, though they are not audiovisual proof in themselves [7]. Reporting on the broader set of allegations against Trump, including multiple accusers and journalistic summaries, provides further context but is distinct from the discrete audio/video items described above [8].
Conclusion: where to verify what exists today
The concrete items most directly verified in contemporary reporting are the Howard Stern Show exchanges from 2004 and 2006 (as archived or excerpted by major outlets), CNN’s past compilations of Trump’s remarks about Ivanka, and the widely cited 2005 Access Hollywood tape transcripts—consulting the Stern archives or archived pages from CNN, BBC and major news outlets that reported or reposted the clips is the practical route to verification; some original platform uploads have been removed and some resurfaced snippets generated debate over context and authenticity, which readers should weigh when viewing them [3] [1] [4] [5] [6].