Has Donald Trump settled any lawsuits with his accusers?

1. What people are actually claiming — a shortlist that matters to readers

The key claims extracted from the supplied analyses fall into two competing narratives: first, that Trump has paid settlements or reached financial agreements in some legal conflicts, notably with media companies, while second, that he has not settled civil claims from accusers like E. Jean Carroll, with juries instead awarding damages that Trump contests on appeal. The dataset explicitly references media payouts of $15m, $16m and $25m tied to ABC, CBS and Meta in one analysis, framing those as settlements ^[1]. In contrast, several other analyses assert that Trump has appealed verdicts and denied guilt, and that the Carroll cases produced $5 million and $83.3 million judgments rather than negotiated settlements ^{[2] [3] [4] [5]}. These are the central, competing factual threads a reader must reconcile.

2. The evidence for media and corporate settlements — what’s on record here

One analysis presents specific settlement figures with major media or tech companies — $15 million with ABC, $16 million with CBS and $25 million with Meta — asserting Trump reached financial resolutions with those organizations ^[1]. If accurate, those entries describe contractual or litigation payoffs distinct from personal-accuser civil claims; they typically arise from defamation, business disputes, or litigation tied to corporate plaintiffs rather than allegations of sexual misconduct. The dataset does not include primary documents or news reports confirming those precise amounts beyond the single analysis, so those figures should be treated as claimed settlement totals within the provided material ^[1]. The analyses do not supply contemporaneous court filings or press releases to independently corroborate the sums inside this set.

3. The E. Jean Carroll litigation — verdicts, not settlements, and active appeals

Multiple analyses in the dataset converge on the same fact pattern for E. Jean Carroll: courts found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, with combined jury awards described as $88.3 million (broken into $5 million and $83.3 million components), and Trump has appealed and sought Supreme Court review of at least one verdict rather than settling privately ^{[3] [4] [5]}. One analysis explicitly notes Trump asked the U.S. Supreme Court to throw out a jury’s finding, underscoring that this dispute is being litigated through the appellate process and is not resolved by settlement ^[2]. The dataset repeatedly frames the Carroll matter as judgment-driven litigation, which legally and practically differs from negotiated settlements between parties.

4. Why the dataset shows conflicting accounts — sources, framing, and omitted documents

The divergence across the supplied analyses reflects differences in scope and subject: some pieces focus on media‑related legal outcomes and report alleged settlement sums, while others center on sexual‑misconduct litigation and emphasize jury awards and appeals. The dataset lacks uniform primary-source citations such as court dockets, settlement agreements, or contemporaneous press statements; instead it provides secondary summaries and fact-check-style pieces that sometimes contradict one another on whether a given matter was a settlement or a judgment ^{[1] [3] [4]}. That omission explains the conflicting language: “settled” can denote private resolution, while “judgment” denotes a court-imposed award — the dataset mixes both without always differentiating them clearly.

5. Legal context that changes the practical meaning of “settled”

In litigation involving public figures, settlements, judgments and appeals carry different legal and public consequences. A private settlement typically ends active litigation and often includes confidentiality; a judgment, by contrast, is an adverse court decision that the defendant can appeal but which remains a matter of public record. The analyses indicate Trump has both engaged in legal settlements with some corporate entities and faced courtroom judgments in at least one high‑profile civil accusation, with ongoing appeals complicating final resolution ^{[1] [3] [5]}. Readers should note that ongoing appeals can delay enforcement of judgments and sometimes produce post‑trial settlements, but the dataset does not provide evidence of such a conversion in the Carroll cases.

6. Bottom line for readers seeking clarity and next steps to verify

Based on the analyses provided, the accurate takeaway is that Trump has settled or resolved some legal disputes with media or corporate parties according to one source, but he did not settle the E. Jean Carroll civil claims — those resulted in jury awards that he is appealing ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}. To confirm these distinctions, consult primary court dockets and contemporaneous reporting for each named case; the dataset’s summaries make strong claims about settlement amounts and judgments but omit the underlying filings that would definitively prove whether each matter was a settlement or a court judgment ^{[1] [3]}.