What did donald trump say about melissa hortman's muder
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided indicate that Donald Trump was asked about lowering flags for Melissa Hortman, and he replied 'I'm not familiar. The who?' [1] [2], suggesting he was unaware of her or her assassination. However, he also claimed that he would have lowered flags if Minnesota Governor Tim Walz had requested it [2] [3] [4], similar to his actions following other notable deaths. It is essential to note that some sources do not mention any statement from Donald Trump regarding Melissa Hortman's murder [5] [6], while one source mentions Donald Trump in the context of the accused's motivations but does not provide any information about Trump's statement [7].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
A key point missing from the original statement is the context of Melissa Hortman's assassination and the subsequent request for flag lowering [1] [2]. The sources suggest that Trump's response was based on his lack of familiarity with Melissa Hortman [1], but they do not provide information on whether a formal request was made by Governor Tim Walz [2] [4]. Alternative viewpoints are also present, with some sources highlighting a perceived inconsistency in Trump's response to the assassination of a Democratic lawmaker versus a conservative activist [2]. Additionally, the sources that do not mention Trump's statement [5] [6] provide a different perspective on the case, focusing on the indictment and plea of the accused rather than Trump's response.
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may contain potential misinformation or bias, as it assumes that Donald Trump made a statement about Melissa Hortman's murder without providing context or verifying the accuracy of the claim [1] [2]. The sources that report Trump's response as 'I'm not familiar. The who?' [1] [2] may be perceived as highlighting Trump's lack of knowledge or empathy, potentially benefiting those who oppose him. On the other hand, the sources that mention Trump's claim that he would have lowered flags if requested [2] [3] [4] may be seen as presenting a more neutral or defensive perspective, potentially benefiting those who support him. The sources that do not mention Trump's statement [5] [6] may be perceived as focusing on the facts of the case rather than Trump's response, potentially benefiting those who prioritize objective reporting [5] [6] [7].