Which of Donald Trump's November 4 2025 posts were deleted and when were they removed?

1. What supporters of the deletion claim point to — and why that trail runs cold

Advocates arguing that Trump had posts deleted on November 4, 2025 point to archival resources that track his social media output and sometimes label items as “Deleted.” The Donald Trump Social Media Archive shows a filtering interface that includes a Deleted option, which suggests the project can record removals but does not, in the sampled outputs, display the specific November 4 items or removal timestamps. The archive entries reviewed explicitly fail to list specific deleted posts for that date, meaning the archive’s metadata either isn’t exposed in the cited views or the queried date yields no deletions — a distinction the materials do not resolve ^{[1] [6]}.

2. Where reporting diverges: media stories point to other deletions, not Trump’s November 4 content

Contemporary reporting in the supplied set discusses deletions, but not of Trump’s posts on November 4, 2025. One ABC News piece details Elon Musk deleting his own posts critical of Trump and notes uncertainty about exact removal timing; it does not state that Trump’s posts were removed on November 4 ^[3]. Other news analyses explore the political effects of Trump’s tweets and platform moderation more broadly — useful context but not evidence of the specific deletions claimed. These sources establish that deletions occurred in the ecosystem, but they separate actor from allegation: Musk deleted his posts, while the archive does not corroborate Trump deletions for that date ^{[2] [3]}.

3. Documents in the packet that are irrelevant or inconclusive about deletions

Several items in the provided materials are unrelated to the deletion question or offer only procedural context. A Yahoo privacy/notice item and an article about Facebook’s earlier decisions on Trump moderation illuminate platform governance but do not identify deleted Trump posts on November 4, 2025 or their removal times. These documents show the regulatory and policy backdrop — useful for understanding how deletions might be recorded or contested — but they do not provide the concrete, dated deletion evidence the original claim requires ^{[4] [5]}.

4. Why the evidence fails to confirm the original statement and what would prove it

The supplied evidence fails because it lacks: (a) an explicit list of Trump posts from November 4, 2025 marked as deleted; (b) timestamps showing when deletions occurred; and (c) platform provenance confirming which service removed content. To turn the claim into a verifiable fact one would need screenshots or archive entries naming the November 4 posts as deleted with removal timestamps, or official platform takedown notices from the hosting services. The current materials instead offer absence of affirmative data: either no deletions occurred on that date per the archive view, or the archive’s deleted-filter results were not included in the packet ^{[1] [6]}.

5. Multiple readings and possible agendas the sources reveal

The documentation suggests two competing impulses: archival projects aiming to preserve and label content deletions, and news coverage focusing on the political theater of moderation. Archival sources present themselves as objective repositories but may omit metadata or require targeted queries to show deletions; news outlets report incidents that fit editorial narratives, such as platform figures deleting controversial posts. These differences can produce confusion where absence of evidence is mistaken for evidence of absence. Given the materials, the responsible conclusion is that the claim about which November 4, 2025 Trump posts were deleted and when cannot be supported without additional, specific archive extracts or platform records ^{[1] [2] [3]}.