Have there been recent hospital visits, medications, or treatments reported for Donald Trump?

1. What visits have been publicly reported — timing and setting

The White House released a memo after an April 11, 2025, annual physical and then announced a second, shorter visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on Oct. 10, 2025, described as a “scheduled follow-up evaluation” or “semiannual physical” by doctors and press briefings; outlets report both the April and October encounters as official, hospital‑based evaluations ^{[1] [7] [8] [2]}.

2. Tests and treatments publicly acknowledged by officials

Officials have said the October Walter Reed visit included advanced imaging — President Trump later said it was an MRI — and routine preventive care such as an updated COVID‑19 booster and an annual flu shot; the April exam included lab work and cognitive/cardiac assessments that formed the basis of the April health memo ^{[3] [8] [4] [2]}.

3. Medications disclosed in the April memo

The April 2025 physician memo listed specific medications: rosuvastatin and ezetimibe for cholesterol control, daily aspirin for cardiac prevention, and topical mometasone used as needed for a skin condition ^[1]. Those are the explicit, named prescriptions found in the public record provided to date ^[1].

4. Diagnoses the White House has announced and public reaction

The White House has publicly disclosed a diagnosis of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) tied to swelling in Trump’s lower legs; health commentary outlets and university health pages explain CVI as a common circulatory condition in older adults that can cause swelling and bruising ^{[5] [7]}. That official CVI disclosure was intended, by White House spokespeople, to quell speculation about the leg swelling ^[7].

5. Officials’ overall health conclusion vs. outside skepticism

White House physician statements and administration spokespeople have repeatedly characterized Trump as being in “exceptional” or “excellent” health and noted a favorable “cardiac age” compared with chronological age ^{[2] [9]}. Independent medical commentators and some former White House physicians have pushed back or noted unexplained gaps — for example, a former White House doctor saying the length of the October visit could suggest additional tests beyond the MRI reported — and some news outlets flagged bruising and swelling that prompted questions ^{[10] [11] [12]}.

6. What the White House has declined to make public

While officials have said radiologists reviewed imaging and affirmed the president’s health, the administration has declined to release detailed imaging reports or the underlying scans themselves; Reuters and other outlets specifically cite the White House’s refusal to divulge those imaging details ^{[6] [4]}. Available reporting does not include full medical charts or complete imaging results in the public domain ^[6].

7. What is settled vs. what remains unclear

Settled, per published memos and reporting: the April medication list (rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, aspirin, mometasone), the CVI diagnosis, an April annual physical, and an October Walter Reed visit that included an MRI and vaccinations and was described as a follow-up ^{[1] [5] [3] [8]}. Unclear from the current reporting: full imaging findings or any other diagnoses beyond CVI and the medications disclosed — reporters and some doctors have raised questions about the reasons for a second hospital visit in one year and whether other tests were performed, but official documentation beyond the memos is not published ^{[10] [7] [4]}.

8. How sources frame motives and transparency issues

The White House frames disclosures as sufficient and intended to dispel rumors ^[7], while critics and some former White House clinicians argue the administration has been selective and encouraged speculation by withholding full records — an implicit political interest in emphasizing presidential fitness contrasts with critics’ demand for medical transparency ^{[11] [10] [12]}. Different outlets reflect these competing perspectives in their coverage ^{[2] [11]}.

Limitations and next steps for readers: my summary uses only the cited reporting and official memos; available sources do not include full medical records or scans, so definitive clinical conclusions beyond what doctors and the White House publicly stated cannot be drawn from current reporting ^{[6] [1]}. If you want, I can compile the exact public memos, press statements and timeline from these sources into a one‑page chronology.