Fact check: What are the names of the women who have publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual assault?

1. What the sources claim when they talk about accusers—and why that number matters

The three sets of analyses repeatedly assert that about 16 women have accused Trump of sexual assault or misconduct, a figure that has been frequently cited in contemporary coverage and political discourse ^{[1] [2]}. This number functions as a shorthand in public debates to indicate the scale of allegations against a public figure, but the provided excerpts consistently treat the count as a summary statement rather than a roster of individual claims. The absence of names in these excerpts means the count cannot be independently verified from the supplied material alone, and readers should note that the exact list and status of allegations vary across reporting and legal records ^[1].

2. Courtroom developments spotlight one plaintiff but don’t name others

Two analyses reference a legal verdict that upheld a $5 million award in a sexual-abuse-related case tied to events alleged to have occurred in 1996, and they note that a plaintiff testified about a violent encounter; however, the provided text does not include the plaintiff’s name ^[3]. The legal outcome is presented as established fact in the material, indicating a judgment in civil proceedings, but the documents omit identifying information and broader context about other claimants. Readers should treat the monetary award and the plaintiff’s testimony as corroborated within these excerpts, while recognizing the lack of individual identification in the supplied analyses ^[3].

3. Media and political coverage cited a 2017 news conference but left names out

One analysis references a 2017 joint news conference where several women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct intended to speak and call for an investigation, yet the excerpt does not list names or outcomes of that event ^[4]. The coverage in these materials frames the conference as a coordinated effort to press for accountability, illustrating how such public moments are used to elevate accusations into the political sphere. The supplied analysis does not provide the accusers’ names, so the reader cannot confirm identities or track how each allegation evolved legally or publicly absent further source material ^[4].

4. Agreement across documents—and a consistent omission that matters

All three source groupings agree on two central points: that multiple women made public accusations (commonly cited as 16), and that at least one civil judgment related to alleged sexual misconduct has been affirmed ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Yet every provided analysis omits a consolidated list of accusers’ names, and where individual plaintiffs or witnesses are referenced—such as a magazine columnist or the civil plaintiff—their names are not supplied. This uniform omission constrains the ability to answer the user’s original question directly from the supplied material and highlights a reporting gap within the provided excerpts ^{[3] [1]}.

5. Divergent tones and potential agendas in the excerpts

The documents include straight reporting of legal rulings and commentary that is more editorial in tone, with one piece characterizing Trump’s behavior toward women and citing long-term associations with figures like Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ^[1]. The presence of opinionated framing alongside legal reportage suggests different agendas—legal fact-reporting versus partisan critique—and readers should distinguish between judicial outcomes reported and interpretive commentary that seeks to place those outcomes in a broader moral or political narrative ^[1].

6. What the supplied material does not give: names, timelines, corroboration

Crucially, none of the provided analyses deliver the names of the women who have publicly accused Donald Trump, nor do they offer a comprehensive timeline or legal status for each allegation ^{[3] [1] [2]}. The material references a 1996 incident and a 2017 conference as anchor points and notes the civil award upheld in related litigation, but the omission of names and detailed case-by-case status prevents a definitive, source-backed list from being compiled using only these excerpts ^{[3] [4]}.

7. Bottom line for the user looking for names

Based solely on the supplied analyses, the accurate answer is that the materials state multiple women—commonly cited as 16—have publicly accused Donald Trump, and at least one civil award related to alleged sexual misconduct has been upheld, but the provided texts do not name the accusers ^{[1] [3]}. To produce a verified roster of names and the legal or public status of each allegation would require additional reporting sources, court records, and contemporaneous news accounts beyond the excerpts provided here.