Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Did Donald Trump have more than 91 criminal charges?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump faced multiple criminal indictments spanning New York state and federal jurisdictions between 2023 and early 2025, but the precise tally of charges reported varies across the provided accounts; the most consistent figures in these sources are 88 criminal counts and a separate figure of 90 felony charges reported elsewhere, while one claim that he faced “more than 91” charges is not consistently supported by the documents provided. All sources agree on a 34-count conviction in the Manhattan “hush-money” case, but they diverge on whether remaining prosecutions were dismissed, ongoing, or quantified as exceeding 91 counts [1] [2] [3].
1. Numbers in dispute — which tallies appear and where they come from
The documents supplied present three competing tallies: one set of analyses reports 88 criminal counts across four indictments [2] [4] [5], another labels the total as 90 felony charges entering the 2024 campaign [3], and a third says the indictments “total[ed] more than 91 charges” while also describing the four major cases [4] [6]. The 88-count figure appears repeatedly and is tied explicitly to a breakdown of four separate cases — the Manhattan hush-money case, the federal classified-documents case, the federal election-interference case, and the Georgia racketeering/election-interference case — suggesting a consistent aggregation methodology in that reporting [2] [4]. By contrast, the “more than 91” claim is offered in a source that provides the same case list but does not show the detailed per-count arithmetic in the analyses provided, leaving the higher number unsubstantiated within that document set [4] [6].
2. Convictions versus indictments — the one clear criminal finding
All supplied analyses converge on a single uncontested outcome: Donald Trump was convicted on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the Manhattan “hush-money” case and that verdict and the sentence details are reported in multiple summaries [1] [6] [7]. That conviction is the only uniform legal determination in these documents; the remaining counts across the other indictments are characterized variously as active, delayed, or dismissed, depending on which analysis is cited [3] [6]. The consistent reporting of the 34-count conviction provides a firm anchor for the overall legal accounting even as aggregate totals for all indictments differ among the sources.
3. Case outcomes that alter the headline totals
At least one supplied analysis reports dismissals or dropped cases, which materially change any running total: one account says special counsel actions led to dropping both the election subversion case and the classified-documents case, and another says two cases were dismissed with one awaiting trial [6] [3]. When counts are dropped or cases are dismissed, previously reported aggregate tallies become outdated; a snapshot that lists 88 or 90 counts at one time may overcount if later filings are dismissed. The variation in reported totals across documents therefore reflects not only counting differences but also real procedural developments (indictments, convictions, dismissals) that occurred over time and are reflected unevenly in the provided analyses [2] [6].
4. Timeline and publication signals that explain differences
The documents carry different publication timestamps and retrospective descriptions: some pieces are dated in early 2025 and summarize the state of play at that moment, while others lack dates in the dataset but still claim higher totals [6] [5] [3]. Reports that aggregate counts at a single moment in legal proceedings can diverge because indictments were filed across months and some counts were consolidated, altered, or later dropped. The repeated citation of 88 counts in several dated analyses suggests that figure reflects a coherent contemporaneous tally, whereas undated or later summaries claiming “more than 91” do not supply the underlying per-count breakdown needed to corroborate a larger total [2] [4].
5. What the evidence supports about the original claim and why accuracy matters
Based on the supplied analyses, the assertion that Donald Trump had “more than 91 criminal charges” is not reliably supported: multiple, recent-appearing accounts in the dataset report 88 counts and another reports 90, while the only unanimous legal outcome is the 34-count conviction in Manhattan. The discrepancy likely arises from evolving case statuses and different counting methods across reporters. Accurate public accounting requires linking per-case charge lists to current court dispositions; without the detailed, dated per-count breakdown that some documents omit, the higher “more than 91” figure remains an unsupported outlier in this dataset [2] [3] [4].