Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which states did the Election Truth Alliance identify as having the most significant election irregularities in 2024?
Executive Summary
The Election Truth Alliance identified North Carolina, Pennsylvania, California (specific counties), Wisconsin, and New York (Rockland County) among states and localities it flagged for the most significant 2024 election irregularities, calling for hand audits and recounts where paper records exist. Multiple documents and related reporting show the Alliance emphasized statistical anomalies and “red shift” patterns in precinct and election-day data, while separate lawsuits and watchdog groups raised overlapping concerns about machine certification, tampering claims, and uncounted ballots [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. What the Election Truth Alliance publicly claimed — patterns and places that stood out
The Alliance’s materials state that North Carolina and Pennsylvania exhibited patterns consistent with vote manipulation, citing statistical evidence in precinct-level and Election Day result data that they argue could have affected the presidential outcome. The organization reported that anomalies were present in 93% of North Carolina counties and described similar Election Day trends in Pennsylvania, urging hand audits of paper ballots to verify results. These claims appear in the Alliance’s statements and press releases as summarized in the provided analyses [1].
2. California counties flagged for a “red shift” — details and scope
The Alliance’s analysis extended to California, citing precinct voting anomalies in Los Angeles, Orange, Alameda, and Tulare Counties described as a concerning “red shift” consistent with patterns seen elsewhere. The July 18, 2025 document specifically names these counties and compares their statistical irregularities to those alleged in North Carolina and Pennsylvania, calling for investigations and audits where paper trails exist. The California-focused report frames these county-level anomalies as part of a broader, multi-state pattern that the Alliance is highlighting [2].
3. Wisconsin and calls for full hand recounts — what was asserted
In its statements, the Alliance also singled out Wisconsin, asserting anomalies in result data that warranted a full hand recount of all individual paper ballots. The Alliance’s materials show a consistent emphasis on statistical signatures they interpret as manipulation and repeatedly call for manual verification. This demand aligns with the organization’s broader strategy to rely on physical paper records to confirm electronic tabulation outcomes, as reflected across its press statements [1].
4. Local litigation and Rockland County — connections beyond the Alliance
Separate legal actions by SMART Legislation pointed to alleged voting discrepancies in Rockland County, New York, including claims of incorrect tallies and voter affidavits saying their ballots were not counted. While some reporting notes that these lawsuits are not explicitly branded by the Election Truth Alliance, analysts drew connections between the local claims and the Alliance’s broader findings, suggesting overlapping concerns about uncounted ballots and machine performance. This linkage is reported in analyses of the lawsuit and Alliance materials [3] [4].
5. Independent reporting and machine-certification concerns — intersecting investigations
Independent coverage referenced broader allegations about voting machine tampering and the role of certification labs, noting claims that a federally accredited lab certified equipment used widely across U.S. counties. These reports do not always mention the Election Truth Alliance by name, but they document parallel investigations and lawsuits that touch on machine certification and statistical anomalies, thereby adding context to the Alliance’s calls for audits and legal scrutiny [5] [6].
6. Assessing corroboration and potential agendas — what’s present and missing
The materials present a mix of direct Alliance claims and separate watchdog or litigation efforts that sometimes converge on the same states. There is evidence of overlapping concerns in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, California counties, Wisconsin, and Rockland County, but the sources provided do not show uniform independent verification of causation or definitive proof of manipulation. The pattern of Alliance advocacy for hand audits, combined with litigation from other groups, suggests an agenda prioritizing paper-based verification and legal remedies to resolve disputed results [1] [2] [3].
7. What additional verification would settle the question — practical next steps
To move from allegation to established fact, the crucial missing elements are independent forensic audits of paper ballots, transparent chain-of-custody records, and cross-validation by nonpartisan experts. The Alliance explicitly calls for hand audits; the lawsuits and reporting recommend forensic examinations of machines and certification processes. Without such independent audits and court adjudication cited in these analyses, the claims remain contested and in need of verification through the processes the Alliance and others are demanding [2] [4] [1].