Fact check: Are there any other states where the Election Truth Alliance has reported election irregularities in 2024?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, the Election Truth Alliance has reported election irregularities in multiple states beyond just one location. The organization has documented concerns in at least four states:

• Pennsylvania - The Election Truth Alliance identified patterns consistent with vote manipulation in the 2024 presidential election results, specifically in Election Day data, and requested a hand audit of the results ^[1]
• North Carolina - The organization provided detailed analysis of election results, highlighting potential vote manipulation and calling for hand audits of paper voting records ^[2]. They have released specific data analysis reports for this state ^[3]
• Nevada - Specifically Clark County, NV is mentioned as an area where the Election Truth Alliance has reported irregularities ^[4]
• California - Listed among the states where the organization has reported election irregularities ^[5]

The analyses also reference several other swing states including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin as being within the organization's scope of focus for the 2024 presidential election, though specific irregularity reports for these states are not detailed in the provided sources ^[6].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important context about the scope and credibility of these election irregularity claims. The analyses reveal that while the Election Truth Alliance has made reports across multiple states, there is no independent verification mentioned of their findings from election officials or other oversight bodies.

Alternative viewpoints that would benefit from examination include:

• Election officials' responses to these claims in the affected states
• Independent verification of the alleged irregularities by established election monitoring organizations
• Legal outcomes of any challenges based on these reports

The question also doesn't address whether these reports have led to concrete action or changes in election procedures, or if they remain unsubstantiated allegations.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself appears neutral in framing, simply asking for factual information about the Election Truth Alliance's activities across states. However, the question implicitly legitimizes the organization's claims by referring to "election irregularities" as established fact rather than as reported allegations or claims.

The phrasing could benefit from more precise language such as "alleged irregularities" or "reported concerns" to maintain objectivity. Additionally, the question doesn't seek context about the credibility or verification status of these reports, which would be crucial for a complete understanding of the situation.

One analysis notes that some sources discuss "various false claims related to the 2024 election" ^[7], suggesting there is ongoing debate about the validity of election-related allegations, though this particular source doesn't specifically address the Election Truth Alliance's claims.