What organizations are members of the Election Truth Alliance?
Executive summary
The publicly available materials examined do not list specific organizations as formal “members” of the Election Truth Alliance (ETA); instead, ETA presents itself as a nonprofit coalition of individuals — citizens, data scientists, statisticians, cybersecurity experts and legal advocates — who produced election analyses and letters to officials [1] [2]. Reporting and site content point to collaborative work with named grassroots publishers on particular investigations, but no source in this set provides a roster of organizational members [1].
1. What ETA publicly claims about who comprises the alliance
ETA’s own descriptions frame it as a nonpartisan nonprofit made up of individual experts and concerned citizens rather than a federation of formally enrolled organizations: the group’s preliminary report describes ETA as “a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization of citizens, data scientists, statisticians, cybersecurity experts, and legal advocates” [1], and its website and social feed emphasize open letters and analyses rather than a membership list [2] [3].
2. No programmatic membership roster was found in the reporting reviewed
A search of ETA’s site, its preliminary Substack report, and its social presence in the provided material produced no explicit list of member organizations or institutional signatories; the sources show activities (lawsuits, letters, analyses) but do not enumerate organizational members or present bylaws or member directories that would identify affiliated groups [2] [1] [3].
3. Named collaborations and cited partners in ETA materials
While ETA doesn’t publish a members list in the provided reporting, it references collaborative work and shared reporting: the ETA preliminary report notes joint “on the ground investigations” and cross-publication with GrassrootsSpeak and It’s Up To Us for parts of its 2024 election analysis series [1], indicating at least project-level cooperation with those outlets rather than formal membership.
4. Possible sources of confusion: similarly named groups and outside listings
External aggregators and finance trackers include entities with similar names, such as an “ALLIANCE FOR TRUTH” entry in FollowTheMoney’s database, which is a distinct entity and not documented within the ETA sources reviewed here as being the same organization [4]; without explicit cross-references in ETA’s own material, conflating similarly named groups would be premature and unsupported by the cited reporting [2] [1].
5. What this silence implies and how to verify membership claims
The absence of a published member roster in ETA’s materials may reflect an organizational choice to emphasize individual experts and ad hoc collaborators rather than institutional affiliation, or simply that membership details haven’t been disclosed in the cited documents; definitive verification would require ETA’s formal filings, a public membership list, or authoritative third‑party reporting that explicitly names member organizations — none of which appear in the provided sources [2] [1].
6. Alternate viewpoints and potential agendas to consider
ETA’s framing as a nonpartisan collective of technical experts can be read as a credibility signal, but critics might view broad labels like “data scientists” or “legal advocates” without named institutional ties as insufficiently transparent; likewise, grassroots publishers that republish or co-investigate with ETA (noted in the Substack) may share perspectives that shape how findings are presented, a dynamic readers and officials should weigh when assessing claims [1].
Conclusion
Based on the available reporting, the Election Truth Alliance is described as a nonprofit coalition of individual experts and citizens and lists project collaborators such as GrassrootsSpeak and It’s Up To Us in specific investigations, but no source among those provided publishes a formal list of member organizations; therefore, a definitive roster of organizational members cannot be produced from these materials [1] [2].