Fact check: Did Elizabeth Warren vote to impeach Trump in 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Elizabeth Warren's specific vote on Trump impeachment in 2025 cannot be determined from the available sources. The analyses reveal that there was indeed an impeachment resolution introduced in 2025, with 79 Democrats voting to proceed with the impeachment while 128 Democrats voted to halt it ^{[1] [2]}. The resolution was House Resolution 537 introduced by Rep. Al Green targeting President Trump over bypassing Congress on war with Iran ^[3].

However, none of the sources specifically mention Elizabeth Warren's individual vote on this 2025 impeachment measure. The sources focus on House Democrats' voting patterns, but Warren serves in the Senate, not the House, which explains why her vote is not mentioned in analyses discussing House voting records ^{[4] [5] [6]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question contains a fundamental procedural misunderstanding. The analyses show that the 2025 impeachment activity occurred in the House of Representatives, where impeachment proceedings must originate according to the Constitution. Elizabeth Warren is a U.S. Senator, not a House Representative, so she would not vote on impeachment articles in the House.

The analyses reveal important historical context: Warren previously voted to convict and remove President Trump from office in 2020 during the Senate impeachment trial ^[7] and called for impeachment proceedings against Trump in 2019 ^{[8] [9]}. This demonstrates her past positions on Trump impeachment matters.

The 2025 impeachment effort was led by Rep. Al Green and focused specifically on Trump's actions regarding Iran policy ^[3], representing a different basis than previous impeachment attempts. The fact that all three members of House Democratic leadership voted to halt the impeachment ^[2] suggests significant internal Democratic opposition to this particular effort.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question demonstrates a misunderstanding of basic constitutional procedures by asking about a Senator's vote on a House impeachment resolution. This type of confusion could stem from:

• Lack of understanding of the separation between House and Senate roles in impeachment proceedings
• Conflation of different impeachment processes - House votes to impeach, Senate votes to convict
• Possible intentional framing to create confusion about Warren's actual role and positions

The question may inadvertently spread misinformation by implying Warren had a vote she constitutionally could not have had, potentially benefiting those who wish to create confusion about Democratic positions on Trump impeachment or undermine understanding of constitutional processes.