Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Did congress publicize Epstein birthday book

Checked on September 10, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses from various sources confirm that Congress did publicize Epstein's birthday book [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The House Oversight Committee released a redacted copy of the alleged 'birthday book' given to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003, which was compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell and contains messages and photos sent by many of Epstein's friends, including a letter carrying a signature resembling US President Donald Trump's [1]. The 'birthday book' is part of a trove of documents released by the committee, which includes a note bearing President Donald Trump’s name that was part of a collection of letters gifted to the late convicted sex offender for his 50th birthday [2] [1]. The book paint a portrait of Epstein's highly sexualised life and lewd encounters with young women [3]. The release of the 'birthday book' by the House Oversight Committee provides evidence that Congress publicized Epstein's birthday book [1] [4] [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key points are missing from the original statement, such as the context of the 'birthday book' and its significance in the Epstein case [1] [2] [3]. The analyses provide different perspectives on the release of the 'birthday book', with some sources focusing on the alleged letter from President Donald Trump [1] [2] [5], while others highlight the sexualized content of the book [3]. Additionally, the sources do not provide a clear explanation of why the 'birthday book' was released by the House Oversight Committee [1] [4] [3]. Alternative viewpoints on the release of the 'birthday book' are not presented in the analyses, such as the potential impact on the Epstein case or the reputation of individuals involved [1] [2] [3].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or incomplete, as it does not provide context about the 'birthday book' or its significance in the Epstein case [1] [2] [3]. The statement may also be biased towards a particular perspective, such as focusing on the alleged letter from President Donald Trump [1] [2] [5]. The sources cited in the analyses may benefit from the release of the 'birthday book', such as the House Oversight Committee, which may be seeking to investigate the Epstein case and hold individuals accountable [1] [4] [3]. On the other hand, individuals involved in the Epstein case, such as President Donald Trump, may be negatively impacted by the release of the 'birthday book' [1] [2] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the significance of Jeffrey Epstein's birthday book in his case?
Did Congress investigate the contents of Jeffrey Epstein's birthday book?
How did the public react to the release of Jeffrey Epstein's birthday book?
Which politicians or public figures were mentioned in Epstein's birthday book?
What redactions were made to Jeffrey Epstein's birthday book before its release?