Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: "Epstein files, the ones that “don’t exist” but were somehow written by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in 2017, even though Epstein wasn’t arrested until 2019….now deemed fake" Is any of this true?

Checked on July 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, the claims in the original statement are false. The analyses reveal several key facts that contradict the statement:

  • No evidence exists that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama wrote any "Epstein files" in 2017 [1] [2] [3] [4]
  • Jeffrey Epstein was indeed arrested in 2019 for sex trafficking of minors, with alleged crimes occurring between 2002 and 2005 [5] [6] [7]
  • Claims connecting Obama and Clinton to Epstein's activities have been debunked as false, with fact-checkers citing a lack of evidence and identifying altered images and misinformation [1]
  • Recent DOJ and FBI investigations concluded there is no evidence of a "client list" and no evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent figures [3] [4]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original statement omits several crucial pieces of context:

  • Donald Trump has made claims that Epstein materials may be "made up" by Democratic Party representatives, suggesting political motivations behind document discussions [8]
  • Elon Musk has claimed that Trump appears in Epstein files, though he provided no evidence to support this assertion [9]
  • There was a previous plea deal in 2007 that allowed Epstein to avoid serious prison time, which provides important background on the case timeline [6] [7]
  • The Trump administration's Justice Department and FBI have actively worked to debunk conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein, including releasing evidence that supports the finding that Epstein died by suicide [4]

Political figures who might benefit from promoting conspiracy theories around Epstein include those seeking to deflect attention from their own connections or to discredit political opponents through unsubstantiated claims.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement contains multiple elements of misinformation:

  • The premise that "Epstein files" were written by Clinton and Obama in 2017 is entirely fabricated - no sources support this claim [2] [3] [4]
  • The statement creates a false timeline contradiction by suggesting documents from 2017 couldn't exist because Epstein wasn't arrested until 2019, when in fact Epstein's criminal activities were documented as occurring from 2002-2005 [5] [7]
  • The framing suggests these files were "deemed fake" when they never existed in the first place according to the analyses provided
  • The statement appears designed to spread conspiracy theories that have been specifically debunked by fact-checkers and official investigations [1] [3] [4]

This type of misinformation benefits those who seek to muddy the waters around legitimate investigations and create false equivalencies between verified facts and conspiracy theories.

Want to dive deeper?
What are the origins of the Epstein files conspiracy theory?
Did Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama ever comment on Jeffrey Epstein?
What evidence supports or debunks the existence of the Epstein files?
How did Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in 2019 relate to his prior interactions with politicians?
What role did fact-checking play in verifying the authenticity of the Epstein files?