Has any Epstein victim ever publicly accused Donald Trump or Lindsey Graham of abuse?
Executive summary
No publicly identified Epstein survivor has credibly and verifiably accused Senator Lindsey Graham of abuse, and established, named Epstein victims who have gone public have not formally accused Donald Trump of wrongdoing tied to Epstein; the public record instead contains unverified allegations and second‑hand claims that appear in released investigative files and viral recordings [1] [2] [3]. Those unverified items—including a rape allegation recorded in DOJ files and names invoked in viral testimony attributed to an alleged survivor—have not been substantiated in court, nor do they replace the absence of a named, public victim’s verified accusation against Trump or Graham [4] [5].
1. What the verified public record of named survivors shows
Survivors who have publicly identified themselves in the Epstein case—including the best‑known plaintiffs and witnesses—have accused various individuals associated with Epstein’s network, but major outlet summaries of the newly released DOJ files and longstanding reporting note that “none of Epstein’s victims who have gone public has accused Trump … or Clinton” [1] [2]; the New York Times and PBS coverage reiterate that many named victims have alleged being forced to have sex with or give massages to some men linked to Epstein, but they emphasize that accusations against Trump have not been made by the victims who have publicly identified themselves [3] [1].
2. Unverified allegations appearing in released DOJ files
The mass DOJ release contained raw, often uncorroborated material; one entry recounts a limousine driver relaying that a woman said “Donald J. Trump had raped her along with Jeffrey Epstein,” language that People described as part of an unverified account in the files and that DOJ treated as part of many unvetted tips in the cache [4] [3]. Major outlets covering the release warned that the tranche includes uncorroborated tips, redactions, and material that federal reviewers flagged as needing vetting before being treated as factual, and some previously published allegations referencing Trump briefly appeared and were then removed or contextualized by news organizations [2] [6] [3].
3. Viral testimony claims and the Sasha Riley story
Separate from the DOJ dump, audio and summaries circulating online attributed to an alleged survivor known as Sasha (or Sascha) Riley name‑checked high‑profile political figures—including Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham—but reporting on those recordings uniformly emphasized that the claims are currently unverified, not part of court records, and have not been corroborated by mainstream investigations [7] [5]. Coverage from Hindustan Times and Times Now noted that Riley’s account has been widely shared and alleges willingness to testify against multiple officials, but both outlets and others explicitly caution that these recordings and summaries have not been validated in the public docket [7] [5].
4. Official and media responses — denials, caveats and the limits of the files
The Department of Justice and news organizations have repeatedly warned that the newly released millions of pages include raw, sometimes sensational or false material that had not been vetted, and outlets noted DOJ efforts to redact victim identities and to flag items as unverified [2] [8] [3]. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing in relation to Epstein and has not been formally accused of crimes by the victims who have identified themselves publicly, a point emphasized in BBC and other reporting [2]. Likewise, there is no public, verified allegation from an identified Epstein survivor against Senator Lindsey Graham in the mainstream record assembled to date [9].
5. Bottom line and reporting limits
Based on available, reputable coverage of the DOJ release and subsequent reporting, no known, publicly identified Epstein victim has made a substantiated public accusation of abuse against Lindsey Graham, and while unverified allegations and second‑hand claims involving Donald Trump appear in the released documents and in viral recordings, they remain uncorroborated by victims who have publicly gone on record or by prosecutorial filings; reporting is explicit about those limits rather than presenting the raw tips as proven fact [1] [4] [5]. If further verified evidence or named victim testimony emerges, that would change the public record; current reporting requires caution and separates verified survivor accusations from uncorroborated material in the files [3] [8].