Fact check: What was the outcome of the investigation into Eric Trump and the Trump foundation's handling of charity funds?

1. Summary of the results

The investigation into Eric Trump and the Trump Foundation's handling of charity funds resulted in Donald Trump being ordered to pay $2 million in damages to eight different charities for misusing charitable funds for political purposes ^[1]. The Trump Foundation was also shut down and dissolved under court supervision ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Additionally, Eric Trump, along with Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, was required to undergo mandatory training on charitable duties as part of the settlement ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The settlement was a result of allegations that the Trump Foundation was used for private and political gain ^{[4] [3]}. The $2 million in damages will be distributed to a group of charities ^{[1] [5]}, and the foundation's remaining $1.7 million in funds will be given to other nonprofits ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources do not provide direct information about the outcome of the investigation into Eric Trump and the Trump Foundation's handling of charity funds ^[6]. However, other sources provide a more detailed account of the investigation and its outcome ^{[1] [5] [2] [3]}. It is also worth noting that the mandatory training requirement for Eric Trump and the other Trump children is an important aspect of the settlement ^{[1] [2] [3]}. The fact that the Trump Foundation was used for private and political gain is a key context that is missing from the original statement ^{[4] [3]}. The following are some key points that were missing from the original statement:

• The Trump Foundation was used for private and political gain ^{[4] [3]}
• The foundation's remaining $1.7 million in funds will be given to other nonprofits ^[2]
• Eric Trump, along with Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, was required to undergo mandatory training on charitable duties ^{[1] [2] [3]}
• The $2 million in damages will be distributed to a group of charities ^{[1] [5]}

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement does not provide a complete picture of the outcome of the investigation into Eric Trump and the Trump Foundation's handling of charity funds ^{[1] [5] [2] [3]}. The statement does not mention the mandatory training requirement for Eric Trump and the other Trump children ^{[1] [2] [3]}, or the fact that the Trump Foundation was used for private and political gain ^{[4] [3]}. This omission could be seen as a bias in the original statement, as it does not provide a full account of the investigation's findings. The following parties may benefit from this framing:

• Eric Trump and the Trump family, as the original statement does not provide a complete picture of their involvement in the misuse of the Trump Foundation ^{[1] [5] [2] [3]}
• The Trump Foundation, as the original statement does not mention the fact that it was used for private and political gain ^{[4] [3]}