EU warned Trump it would liquidate U.S. Treasury bonds if he supports Putin
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The claim that “the EU warned Trump it would liquidate U.S. Treasury bonds if he supports Putin” is not supported by definitive public evidence; sensational reporting in outlets like the Daily Express frames anonymous “insiders” as saying European leaders have discussed a drastic “nuclear option” of selling US Treasuries, but mainstream coverage instead records alarm, internal debate and contingency planning rather than an explicit EU threat to dump US debt [1] [2] [3]. Credible outlets document a transatlantic rift and talk of economic leverage — including discussion of frozen Russian assets and new joint European borrowing — but do not record a formal EU warning that it would liquidate Treasuries as a punitive response to a US deal with Putin [4] [5] [6].
1. Where the “liquidate Treasuries” story comes from and how it’s been reported
The most vivid version of the story appears in tabloid and aggregated pieces that cite unnamed “insiders” and a Wall Street Journal briefing to allege European leaders are “weighing” steps that could include liquidating trillions in US government bonds to punish a possible US rapprochement with Russia [1] [2]. Those reports frame the idea as a rehearsed option in European capitals, presented as potential leverage because EU and UK entities are among the largest foreign holders of US Treasury securities [2]. However, the sourcing is opaque in those stories: they rely on second‑hand characterizations of private intelligence assessments and diplomatic anxiety rather than an official EU communique or parliamentary resolution authorizing such a move [1] [2].
2. What more sober reporting shows about European options and divisions
Established outlets and policy analysis emphasize a different picture: Europe is alarmed by unilateral US moves toward Russia and is debating how to preserve Ukraine and its own security without inflicting self‑harm, not openly promising to collapse US markets [3] [4]. The Financial Times and Politico document deep divisions in capitals over how far to push back on Washington while protecting Ukraine, and reporting highlights concrete measures under discussion — using frozen Russian assets, raising joint EU debt for defence, and other forms of economic coercion — rather than a stated plan to liquidate US Treasuries [3] [4] [5].
3. The economics and politics that make a Treasuries dump unlikely as a credible threat
Analysts and commentators note practical and political constraints on any mass sell‑off of US debt: such a move would hurt European holders by depressing bond prices and could destabilize global markets, producing blowback on European banks and currencies, which helps explain why reporting emphasizes debate and contingency rather than a formal ultimatum [5] [7]. Opinion pieces and policy briefs instead argue Europe’s most effective levers are coordinated funding, defence industrial cooperation and targeted use of frozen Russian assets — approaches that build European autonomy rather than weaponizing US Treasuries [5] [7].
4. Motives, agendas and why the narrative spread
The more alarmist headlines serve clear political narratives on multiple sides: they amplify European anger at a perceived American pivot, bolster US domestic warnings about foreign retaliation, and create sensational copy for audiences attuned to geopolitical brinkmanship [1] [6]. At the same time, mainstream European and US outlets stress diplomatic maneuvering, internal EU splits over using frozen Russian assets for Ukraine, and strategic efforts to preserve leverage without self‑inflicted financial harm [4] [8] [9].
5. Bottom line: what can be said definitively and what remains unproven
Reporting shows European leaders are alarmed, discussing a range of responses if Washington moves toward a deal perceived as abandoning Ukraine, and some publications have relayed anonymous suggestions that a Treasuries sell‑off was on the table [1] [2] [3]. What cannot be shown in available reporting is an official, recorded EU warning to President Trump that it would liquidate US Treasury bonds — no public EU statement, vote or credible on‑the‑record source has been produced to substantiate that specific ultimatum [3] [4]. Thus the claim overstates the evidence: talk and contingency planning exist, but a formal EU warning to dump Treasuries has not been demonstrated by the sources at hand [1] [3] [4].