“nearly 100% of European leaders have attacked their own citizens using tax money” and that leaders like Starmer, Macron, Merkel are corrupt and destroying culture.
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The broad claim that “nearly 100% of European leaders have attacked their own citizens using tax money” is not supported by the reporting provided, which documents real but discrete corruption scandals at EU and national levels rather than a universal conspiracy of rulers weaponising public funds against citizens [1] [2] [3]. High-profile probes — from Qatargate to the European Public Prosecutor’s recent action against Federica Mogherini and others — show systemic vulnerabilities and episodic misuse of funds, but do not substantiate an empirical assertion that almost all European leaders are corrupt or deliberately “destroying culture” [4] [2] [5].
1. What the reporting actually documents: institutional scandals, not universal guilt
Recent journalism and watchdog reports chronicle a string of significant corruption investigations involving EU institutions and some national figures: the EPPO has accused former EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini of procurement fraud and related offences in a tender for a diplomatic academy [6] [1], the “Qatargate” scandal revealed alleged bribery of MEPs connected to foreign influence [5] [7], and organisations such as Transparency International EU and Follow the Money have catalogued numerous parliamentary scandals among MEPs and officials [8] [3]. None of these sources claim that “nearly 100%” of European leaders are culpable; instead they show recurring instances of corruption in specific institutions and positions [2] [9].
2. Examples of public-money abuse are concrete but limited in scope
The reporting provides concrete instances where public procurement, gifts or influence appear to have been used improperly — from allegedly rigged tenders linked to the College of Europe diplomatic academy (EPPO investigations) to multi‑year bribery probes targeting MEPs and foreign actors seeking influence (Qatargate) — illustrating how taxpayers’ funds and public trust can be compromised [2] [4] [5]. Independent watchdogs have argued that reforms were inadequate after earlier scandals, suggesting systemic weaknesses that enable repeated wrongdoing rather than a blanket assault by every leader on their citizens [8] [10].
3. The charge that leaders “attack their own citizens using tax money” needs specific evidence
The phrase implies intentional policy decisions diverting taxpayer resources to harm domestic populations; the sources instead describe corruption, procurement irregularities and improper lobbying—illegal or unethical acts that divert public resources or influence policy, but not a coordinated programme by “nearly 100%” of leaders to attack citizens. Reporting on Ukraine shows how graft can siphon funds from critical public needs, which is a precise illustration of public-money harm, but this is about failures of oversight rather than ideological attacks on culture or citizens [11].
4. On Starmer, Macron and Merkel: the provided reporting does not substantiate those particular accusations
None of the supplied sources present verified allegations tying Rishi Sunak’s Labour leader Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, or Angela Merkel to the types of corruption documented here; the dossiers focus on EU institutions, named EU officials and various national cases without implicating those three leaders by name [6] [1] [2]. That absence does not prove innocence — it simply means the current reporting set does not support the specific claim that Starmer, Macron or Merkel are corrupt or intentionally “destroying culture,” and a rigorous assessment would require direct, substantiated reporting about each individual.
5. Political exploitation and narratives: why sweeping claims spread
The documented scandals feed populist and nationalist narratives that portray Brussels and elite institutions as corrupt and out of touch, a dynamic noted explicitly by analysts and quoted politicians who exploit lapses to delegitimise opponents [2] [10]. Watchdogs warn that weak reforms after previous exposures allow further ethical failures [8], and media coverage of high-profile arrests naturally amplifies perceptions of systemic rot even while investigations are ongoing and legal standards of presumption of innocence apply [6] [1].
6. Bottom line: substantiated corruption exists; sweeping universal claims do not
Reporting shows important, systemic problems — recurring scandals affecting EU bodies and some national actors, concrete EPPO investigations, and watchdog warnings about insufficient reform — which justify public concern and legal scrutiny [2] [8] [4]. However, the loaded claim that nearly all European leaders have weaponised tax money against citizens, and that named leaders like Starmer, Macron or Merkel are categorically corrupt and culturally destructive, goes beyond the evidence in these sources and requires specific, corroborated allegations that the current reporting does not provide [6] [11].