Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Have any photos, flight logs, or documents placed Biden with Epstein or at Epstein properties?
Executive summary
Available public reporting and fact‑checks show no authentic photo, flight log entry, or public court document that places Joe Biden socially or travel‑wise at Jeffrey Epstein’s properties; viral images purporting to show Biden with Epstein have been repeatedly debunked as doctored composites (see Reuters, AFP, Snopes, PolitiFact) [1] [2] [3] [4]. Multiple batches of Epstein‑related materials have been released by courts, media and Congress since 2019 and in 2025, but public searches of released flight logs, address books and court records cited in reporting turned up no mentions of Biden in those available documents [5] [6].
1. Doctored photos circulated; fact‑checkers identify the originals
Major fact‑checking outlets say the viral “Biden with Epstein” photographs are composites made from two unrelated images: one of Epstein with someone else, and another of Biden at a separate event. Reuters’ fact check concluded the image was digitally altered and that the Biden portion came from a Friedlander Group photo while the Epstein portion came from a circa‑2005 shot with a different man [1]. AFP reported Getty Images confirmed manipulation and that Biden does not appear in the Epstein photo [2]. Snopes and PolitiFact independently reached the same conclusion, showing the genuine source photos and labeling the composite fake [3] [4].
2. What the released flight logs and “black book” show — and do not show
The Epstein “black book” and many flight logs have been published, partially unredacted or in court filings over the years; they include a number of high‑profile names but, according to searchable public releases and fact checks, do not list Joe Biden in the materials publicized to date [5] [7]. News outlets and databases created from released documents have been used to search for particular names; those searches, as cited in reporting, did not turn up Biden’s name among the publicly available entries [5].
3. New document releases in 2025 expanded the record but did not produce evidence linking Biden to Epstein’s properties
In 2025 congressional committees and the Department of Justice produced or released tens of thousands of pages of Epstein‑related materials, and House members posted large batches of emails and estate documents [6] [8]. Reporting on these releases has highlighted communications mentioning other public figures and travel details that have drawn attention to Donald Trump and others, but the most cited coverage and summaries do not identify any released photograph, flight log entry or document that places Joe Biden at Epstein properties [9] [6]. Available sources do not mention any authenticated record tying Biden to Epstein properties.
4. Why absence of mention in released records is not the same as proof of absence — and how sources frame limits
Journalists and officials warn that released batches are partial and often redacted for legal or privacy reasons; the Justice Department has previously withheld or redacted material citing ongoing investigations and privacy concerns [10] [11]. Fact‑checkers and news outlets therefore note limitations: absence of Biden’s name in publicly released flight logs and black book pages is evidence about the released record, but not a conclusive statement about every seized item [5] [11]. That distinction is important because political actors on all sides have used incomplete releases to argue both that names were hidden and that allegations are unfounded [10].
5. Political context and competing narratives around the records
Reporting shows the Epstein files became a political flashpoint in 2024–2025: Republicans demanded transparency and later released large document sets, Democrats released other batches, and both sides accused the other of selective leaks and bad faith [12] [13]. Some commentators and officials assert that earlier administrations withheld documents for legal reasons; others say non‑disclosures fueled conspiracy theories. Coverage highlights that released emails and logs have prompted scrutiny primarily of figures who appear in those records [10] [9].
6. Bottom line for your question — what documentation exists and how it’s been verified
Current, credible fact checks and news reporting — which compare originals and doctored images and which review publicly released flight logs and contact lists — find no authenticated photo, flight log entry, or court document in the public record that places Joe Biden at Epstein properties or posing with Jeffrey Epstein [1] [2] [3] [5]. If new, unredacted files are released beyond the batches already public, that would change the evidentiary basis; available sources do not mention such material linking Biden to Epstein as of the cited reporting [6] [8].
Limitations: this summary uses only the provided reporting and fact checks; it does not assess unpublished or yet‑to‑be‑released files and notes that agencies have cited legal reasons for redactions and partial releases [10] [11].