Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Were there 15 million extra votes for Joe Biden
Executive summary
Claims that there were “15 million extra votes for Joe Biden” refer to social-media charts comparing Biden’s 2020 popular vote (about 81 million) with later Democratic totals and pointing to a ~14–20 million gap; fact‑checking outlets say those visuals are misleading because vote counts were incomplete and contain data errors, not proof of fraud [1] [2] [3]. Multiple fact‑checks and news analyses explain that late count updates, county “vote dumps,” clerical errors, and still‑incomplete tallies in states such as California explain large apparent differences in short‑term graphs — not a sudden, secret addition of millions of votes to Biden in 2020 [4] [5] [6].
1. What the viral claim actually showed: dramatic charts, not audited totals
The viral posts typically displayed a bar or line chart that made Biden’s 2020 popular‑vote total look anomalously large compared with other years and suggested “missing” Democratic votes in subsequent elections; one widely shared graphic implied roughly 15 million fewer Democratic votes than Biden’s 81 million 2020 total [2] [3]. FactCheck.org and AFP traced the earliest versions to outlets like ZeroHedge and social posts on X and warned the graphics were produced from incomplete snapshots of counting rather than from certified, audited final totals [2] [3].
2. Why the spike/gap narratives are analytically flimsy: timing, incomplete counts, and clerical fixes
News organizations and election data analysts repeatedly pointed out that apparent “spikes” in vote totals come from counties releasing large batches of results at once — sometimes from mail‑in or absentee counts concentrated in Democratic areas — and from brief clerical entry mistakes that are later corrected [4] [5] [6]. For example, Reuters and AP documented county dumps and a clerical error in Michigan’s Shiawassee County (an extra zero) that produced an artificial jump before being fixed; those kinds of events, not mass fraud, explain many sudden increases in one candidate’s running tally [5] [6].
3. Incomplete 2024/2025 counts fueled comparisons to 2020 but don’t prove malfeasance
When people compared Biden’s 2020 81.2 million votes to lower early tallies for Democrats in 2024, major fact checks and journalists said the differences reflected that many ballots — especially in heavily Democratic states like California — had not yet been counted, and that final totals were still changing as counts continued [1] [3] [7]. AFP and Newsweek noted that turnout patterns and outstanding ballots meant early charts understated the Democratic side, and Election Lab data showed 2024 turnout was on track to be lower than 2020 but still high — none of which constitutes evidence of retroactive vote‑insertion [3] [2] [7].
4. What authoritative reviews and audits found about 2020
Independent audits, recounts and court decisions after the 2020 election did not find evidence of widespread fraud that would explain an extra 15 million votes; fact‑checking organizations have repeatedly rejected claims that “excess” Biden votes imply a stolen election, calling some state‑by‑state “excess vote” reports methodologically unsound [8] [3]. AP and other outlets have labeled specific reports asserting large unexplained surpluses as false because they rest on incorrect assumptions about registration and turnout trends [8] [4].
5. Competing narratives and political motives to watch for
The claim has been promoted across political lines: some critics used the gap to argue 2024 Democrats underperformed or people “disappeared,” while others revived it to allege 2020 fraud. Fact‑checkers warn that both sides can weaponize incomplete data to feed narratives; outlets such as FactCheck.org and Reuters note that platforms like ZeroHedge and certain influencers circulated simplified charts that amplified confusion rather than clarified it [2] [5]. Always inspect whether a post shows final certified totals, provisional totals, or an early snapshot of counting — that context determines how much weight the figure should carry [3].
6. Bottom line for readers: no credible evidence of a 15‑million vote insertion
Available reporting and fact checks show the “15 million extra Biden votes” narrative stems from misread charts, incomplete counts, and documented clerical anomalies — not from evidence of a mass addition of votes to Biden’s 2020 total. Outlets including AP, Reuters, AFP, FactCheck.org and Newsweek conclude the viral graphics are misleading and that audits/courts did not substantiate claims of mass fraud in 2020 [4] [5] [3] [2] [8]. If you want to evaluate a specific chart, seek the original data source and whether the numbers are provisional, updated later, or formally certified [5] [6].