What evidence exists of Donald Trump publicly identifying as non‑denominational Christian or Presbyterian over time?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Public evidence shows Donald Trump has long been associated with Presbyterian roots—he was confirmed in a Presbyterian church as a youth and historically described himself as a mainline Protestant—yet in later public statements he has explicitly said he now identifies as a nondenominational Christian, while continuing to cultivate ties with evangelical leaders and faith institutions [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Early life and explicit Presbyterian connection
Biographical sources and reporting note that Trump was raised in his mother's Presbyterian faith and was confirmed at a Presbyterian church in 1959, a fact reporters and denominational outlets routinely cite when tracing his religious origins [1] [2].
2. Public identification as a Presbyterian during political life
Through much of his public career, including his first presidency, Trump was publicly identified—and identified himself—as a Presbyterian or mainline Protestant; contemporary fact‑checks and profiles recorded that he “identifies as Presbyterian,” and denominational lists of presidents counted him among presidents affiliated with Presbyterianism [5] [6].
3. The explicit pivot to “nondenominational Christian” in recent statements
In a written interview with Religion News Service first reported in 2020 and summarized by denominational and news outlets, Trump stated he no longer identifies as Presbyterian and now considers himself a nondenominational Christian—an explicit self‑identification that multiple outlets (including the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) and Newsweek) later quoted and contextualized [3] [4] [1].
4. Public religious behavior, advisers and messaging that complicate labels
Independent of formal affiliation, Trump’s public religious behavior has been eclectic: he attended Marble Collegiate Church in New York in earlier years and was influenced by Norman Vincent Peale’s “positive thinking” Christianity, he has had a Pentecostal‑leaning spiritual adviser (Paula White), and he has publicly prayed with Southern Baptist leaders and attended Baptist services—activities that show practical religious alliances across denominations even before his nondenominational claim [7] [2] [5].
5. Institutional and political actions tied to faith identity
As president and afterward, Trump also elevated religious issues institutionally—nominating religiously affiliated officials and creating or staffing faith‑oriented offices or commissions—and his campaigns and merchandise increasingly incorporated Christian imagery and Bible sales, moves that signal an ongoing public use of Christian identity for political mobilization regardless of denominational label [8] [7].
6. Public perception vs. self‑identification: survey evidence
Survey data show a disconnect between Trump’s self‑identification and public perception: a Pew Research study reported that many Americans did not regard him as particularly religious even while noting his stated Presbyterian affiliation, and broader polling during his earlier presidency found a majority of Americans doubted his religiousness—evidence that labels alone did not resolve how the public reads his faith claims [5] [7].
7. Assessment: what the documented evidence supports and its limits
The documentary record supports two clear, public facts: Trump was raised Presbyterian and was publicly identified as such for years, and he later told Religion News Service he considers himself a nondenominational Christian—both assertions are reported in denominational outlets and national media [1] [3] [4]. What remains less settled in the public record is the depth of doctrinal commitment implied by either label and whether changes in identification reflect theological conviction, political strategy, or both; reporting documents behaviors, advisers and political uses of religion but cannot, on available sources, definitively attribute motive beyond the statements themselves [7] [5] [2].