Have any medical or cognitive experts publicly assessed Trump's IQ claims since 2025?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
No medical or cognitive experts’ public assessments of Donald Trump’s IQ after 2025 are cited in the supplied reporting; coverage in late 2025 documents experts saying the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a dementia screen, not an IQ test, and that it is not correlated with IQ [1] [2]. Fact-checkers have found no verifiable public IQ score for Trump and have debunked specific claims such as a 73 score [3].
1. What happened in late 2025: a public mix‑up that prompted expert comment
In October 2025 Trump described a “very hard” IQ test he said he took at Walter Reed; journalists and clinicians identified the exam as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a 10‑minute dementia screening used to detect mild cognitive impairment rather than to measure intelligence [2] [4]. The MoCA’s creator, neurologist Ziad Nasreddine, told NBC News the screening “should not be used to measure intelligence” and that “there are no studies showing that this test is correlated to IQ tests” [1].
2. What experts actually said about the test and IQ claims
Multiple outlets quoted clinicians and reporting notes that the MoCA assesses domains like memory, attention, language and visuospatial skills and is not an IQ instrument; coverage emphasized that many MoCA items are elementary and the tool’s purpose is early detection of cognitive decline, not assessing intellectual potential [2] [4]. The primary expert quote supplied in the reporting is from Nasreddine stressing the lack of correlation with IQ [1].
3. What investigators and fact‑checkers found about Trump’s IQ score claims
There is no publicly verified IQ score for Trump in the supplied sources. Full Fact examined circulating social posts claiming a 73 IQ and found no evidence such a score exists, noting media coverage only debunked the claim and no official IQ score has been reported [3]. Other outlets reiterated that while Trump has bragged about cognitive‑test performance, that does not equal an IQ measurement [5] [6].
4. Limits of the public record and what the supplied sources do not show
Available sources do not mention any independent, peer‑reviewed neuropsychological evaluations or published IQ assessments of Trump after 2025; they record clinical use of the MoCA in his physicals and experts explaining the test’s purpose [5] [2]. Sources do not provide new IQ testing data nor public statements from neuropsychologists assigning an IQ number post‑2025; those facts are simply not found in current reporting [3].
5. Conflicting perspectives and political context to keep in mind
Reporting frames the episode politically: Trump used the “IQ” language to insult opponents and to boast, while clinicians and test creators framed his words as a misunderstanding of clinical screening tools [2] [4]. Polling and partisan perceptions of leaders’ intelligence are separate phenomena—YouGov coverage shows public perceptions of political figures’ IQs are heavily partisan and distinct from clinical measures [7].
6. Why clinicians warn against equating MoCA with IQ
Journalists repeatedly cited the MoCA’s design and intent: it’s a brief clinical screen for cognitive impairment, not a standardized intelligence battery, and it lacks validation as an IQ proxy, per the test’s developer and explanatory reporting [1] [2]. That is the central expert-based corrective in all supplied accounts.
7. Bottom line for readers seeking updated expert assessments
Based on the supplied reporting, post‑2025 public expert commentary focuses on correcting the record about the MoCA and denying any correlation with IQ; there is no sourced, public evaluation from medical or cognitive experts that endorses or provides a verifiable IQ score for Trump after 2025 [1] [3]. If you need a professional cognitive appraisal or a formal IQ measurement, the current public record in these sources does not contain one [3].
Limitations: this summary uses only the supplied articles; other reporting or direct medical disclosures outside these sources may exist but are not referenced here.