Which fact‑checking organizations have published rulings on Donald Trump's health and cognitive test claims?

1. Which named fact‑checker appears in the reporting

FactCheck.org is present among the provided materials as a recognized fact‑checking site ^[1]; that entry establishes the outlet’s existence and scope as a general fact‑checking resource, but the supplied snippet does not include a specific FactCheck.org ruling text about Trump’s cognitive‑test claims, only the site’s broader record of checking political claims ^[1].

2. What the other supplied sources say about the cognitive‑test controversy

A National Library of Medicine summary referencing The New York Times and other coverage documents a surge of public interest in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) after reports that Trump took that test, and it explains that such screenings detect some forms of impairment but are not intelligence tests ^[2]; Time’s reporting captures Trump’s own public statements that he “aced” cognitive testing and his denunciations of critical coverage as “seditious,” but it does not itself present a labeled fact‑check ruling ^[3]; and the Wikipedia entry assembled in the packet chronicles wider debate over Trump’s health, including clinicians’ public commentary and Trump’s characterization of the MoCA as an “IQ” test, without listing formal rulings by other fact‑checking organizations ^[4].

3. Limits of the available reporting and what cannot be asserted

The supplied sources do not list rulings from other widely known fact‑check organizations (for example, PolitiFact, The Washington Post Fact Checker, AP Fact Check, or Snopes) within this packet, so asserting that those organizations published specific rulings would exceed the evidence provided here ^{[2] [3] [1] [4]}. The materials do show that the subject received extensive media and medical attention — including concerns about mischaracterizing the MoCA and confusion over whether it measures intelligence ^{[2] [4]} — but the packet lacks direct citations demonstrating that any named fact‑check outlet besides FactCheck.org published formal verdicts on particular health or cognitive‑test claims.

4. Alternative perspectives and implicit agendas in the sources

Medical and academic coverage in the NLM/NYT summary frames the MoCA as a clinical screening tool with narrow diagnostic scope, implicitly countering political simplifications that boost or dismiss a candidate’s fitness ^[2]; Time’s piece records Trump’s rhetorical framing of media coverage as malicious, an implicit strategy to delegitimize scrutiny ^[3]; and Wikipedia’s compilation shows both clinicians who publicly opined on cognitive fitness and the ethical debates (Goldwater rule) that constrain such commentary, suggesting competing incentives — public safety vs. professional ethics — that shape how claims are voiced and judged ^[4]. FactCheck.org’s presence in the sources signals the availability of institutionalized verification, but the packet does not reveal how that organization’s analytics or verdicts have been applied to specific test‑related claims here ^[1].

5. Bottom line for readers following the record

Based on the documents provided, FactCheck.org is the only explicitly named fact‑checking organization in the reporting packet ^[1]; other materials in the packet cover the MoCA’s medical meaning and Trump’s public statements about taking or “acing” cognitive exams ^{[2] [3]}, and an aggregated encyclopedia entry tracks broader debate and clinician commentary ^[4]. To compile a comprehensive list of fact‑checking rulings beyond what is contained here would require consulting the archives or articles of other known fact‑checkers directly, because the supplied sources do not supply those additional citations ^{[2] [3] [1] [4]}.