What exactly did fact‑checkers find about Trump's numerical claims regarding Somalis and welfare or fraud?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Fact‑checkers found that key numerical claims President Trump made about Minnesota’s Somali community — that “like 88%” receive welfare and that Somalis stole “billions” every year or were responsible for “up to 90%” of the fraud — are unsupported by public evidence and are contradicted by available reporting on the fraud investigations and demographics [1] [2] [3]. Independent news outlets and fact‑checking partnerships documented that while several large fraud cases involving some Somali‑descent defendants exist, the scale and attribution Trump claimed are exaggerated, often unverified, and sometimes misleadingly framed [4] [5] [6].
1. What Trump actually said and how fact‑checkers framed it
President Trump accused Somali immigrants of ripping off Minnesota “every year” for “billions” and said “like 88%” of Somalis receive welfare, later claiming as much as “up to 90%” of the Minnesota fraud was caused by people who came illegally from Somalia; fact‑checkers flagged those numerical assertions as unsupported and not backed by data provided by the White House [1] [2] [3].
2. What the fraud investigations show — limited, specific, not universal
Reporting shows multiple federal probes into pandemic‑era child nutrition and other social services schemes that led to indictments and convictions, including a Justice Department case described as a roughly $250 million scheme tied to child nutrition and a broader set of probes prosecutors have at times estimated might involve up to billions — figures that are contested and vary by source — but those investigations do not substantiate a blanket claim that Somalis stole “billions every year” [7] [5] [8].
3. Why the “88% on welfare / 90% causing fraud” claims fail scrutiny
FactCheck.org and partner outlets found the White House provided no evidence for the “88%” welfare figure and that Trump’s “up to 90%” attribution to people who entered illegally from Somalia lacked verification; demographic data and reporting note the Somali population in Minnesota includes many U.S. citizens and legally arrived residents, undermining the implication that the community broadly consists of recent illegal entrants responsible for most fraud [1] [2] [9].
4. Nuance: many defendants are of Somali descent, but leadership and scope vary
Several news outlets noted that many charged defendants in the recent cases are of Somali background, but the federal prosecutions include non‑Somalis, and in at least one prominent case a white ringleader was identified as central to the scheme — a fact that complicates simple attributions of culpability to an entire ethnic group [3] [5] [4].
5. The role of viral videos and partisan amplification
Fact‑checkers and mainstream outlets reported that claims driving the White House’s rhetoric were amplified by a viral video from a right‑wing creator whose allegations could not be independently verified; journalists warned that unvetted online claims helped inflate perceptions of the scale and ethnic concentration of fraud [4] [6].
6. Alternative viewpoints and possible agendas
Pro‑administration sources and some conservative commentators argue the probes show systemic fraud warranting aggressive action and even denaturalization reviews, while critics and many local officials say the rhetoric scapegoats a vulnerable community and overstretches the evidence; fact‑checking outlets emphasize the difference between prosecuting individual crimes and ascribing collective guilt or presenting precise percentages without data [10] [11] [7].
7. Bottom line from fact‑checkers
Fact‑checkers concluded the President’s numerical claims about “88%” on welfare and “billions” stolen annually, and the “up to 90%” attribution to Somali illegal entrants, were unsupported by the evidence presented; while real fraud prosecutions exist and have produced convictions, the specific percentages and blanket monetary claims promoted by the White House and viral social posts were not substantiated in the public record reviewed by fact‑checking organizations and news outlets [1] [12] [2] [3].