Who are the most famous Holocaust deniers alive today?

1. What the documents claim — a fast inventory of names that recur in the material

The provided analyses repeatedly assert that David Irving is a central living figure in Holocaust denial, described as “the world’s most prominent Holocaust denier” and linked to high-profile legal defeats, publishing, and bans from countries like Germany and Australia ^{[1] [6] [7]}. Ursula Haverbeck is named as a leading German denier who has faced multiple convictions and prison sentences and is presented as one of the best-known contemporary European deniers ^{[2] [8]}. The Center on Extremism material identifies Mark Weber and Germar Rudolf as continuing denial promoters; Weber is tied to the Institute for Historical Review and Rudolf to writings denying gas chambers and legal punishment in Germany ^{[3] [4]}. The ADL profile singles out Michael A. Hoffman II as an active denialist and conspiracy theorist ^[5].

2. How sources portray prominence — legal fights, publications, and bans that raise profiles

The sources frame prominence largely through public actions: court cases, books, organizational leadership, and criminal convictions. Irving’s prominence is grounded in his authorship of revisionist histories, his libel case loss to Deborah Lipstadt, and repeated travel bans and criminal penalties noted across profiles ^{[1] [6] [7]}. Haverbeck’s notoriety stems from repeated German convictions for denial and incitement, with recent prison sentences amplifying her profile in media reporting ^{[2] [8]}. Weber’s long-term stewardship of the Institute for Historical Review and editorial role gave him institutional visibility within denialist networks, while Rudolf’s publications and a criminal sentence for hatred-related offenses spotlight his technical and legal profile ^{[3] [4]}. Hoffman’s ADL profile frames him as an ideologue whose writings sustain denialist currents ^[5].

3. Where sources agree and diverge — a map of consensus and uncertainty

There is clear agreement that Irving and Haverbeck are central contemporary figures in Holocaust denial; multiple analyses repeat these names and the same core facts about their legal troubles and ongoing activity ^{[1] [6] [7] [2]}. The degree to which Weber, Rudolf, and Hoffman are presented as “most famous” varies: the Center on Extremism profiles them as notable within extremist and denialist milieus, but their public prominence relative to Irving and Haverbeck is portrayed as lesser or more specialized ^{[3] [4] [5]}. Some documents note deaths of formerly prominent deniers and emphasize that many historically prominent figures are now deceased, which narrows the contemporary field to a handful of living figures ^{[2] [9] [8]}.

4. Important omissions and limitations in the dataset provided

The supplied analyses do not present a systematic ranking or exhaustive list; they are fragmentary profiles that emphasize a few individuals and often lack consistent publication dates or comprehensive contemporary activity logs ^{[1] [6] [7] [5] [3] [4] [2] [9] [8]}. Several profiles lack up-to-date status checks on living status or current activity levels, and one analysis notes Haverbeck’s death in one item while another treats her as still alive, signaling inconsistency in temporal reporting within the dataset ^{[2] [9]}. The materials focus more on biographical and legal details than on media visibility metrics or influence measurements that would clarify who is truly “most famous” in public discourse beyond extremist circles ^{[7] [3]}.

5. Motives, audiences, and how framing shapes reputations

The sources come from different institutional vantage points—extremism-monitoring organizations, anti-hate groups, and encyclopedic summaries—and that shapes emphasis: watchdog groups foreground criminal penalties and extremist networks, encyclopedic entries emphasize biographical detail, and extremist-affiliated outlets historically have sought to amplify certain figures. This produces discrete agendas: monitoring groups aim to document harms and legal consequences, while academic or neutral summaries aim to contextualize. These differing aims influence which names are highlighted and how prominence is characterized, so assessments of “most famous” reflect both objective facts like legal history and subjective editorial choices about importance ^{[6] [5] [2]}.

6. Bottom line — who the materials identify today and what’s still unresolved

Based on the supplied analyses, the clearest contemporary figures identified are David Irving and Ursula Haverbeck, with Mark Weber, Germar Rudolf, and Michael A. Hoffman II repeatedly named as notable living denialists within extremist or revisionist networks ^{[1] [6] [7] [2] [3] [4] [5]}. The dataset does not provide a definitive, up-to-date ranking or exhaustive list, and internal inconsistencies about status and dates mean further verification from current, dated reporting would be necessary to finalize a precise list of the “most famous” living deniers at this moment ^{[9] [8]}.