Fact check: How do far-left and far-right extremist groups differ in their ideologies and tactics?

1. Summary of the results

The analyses provided highlight the differences and similarities between far-left and far-right extremist groups in the United States ^[1]. Key similarities include their antidemocratic nature and the danger they pose to the country. However, significant differences exist in their ideologies, goals, tactics, and membership ^[1]. Far-left groups often focus on social justice issues and align with socialist or anti-capitalist values, lacking hierarchical structures ^[2], while far-right groups frequently espouse traditional American values, white supremacy, and extremes of Christianity and patriotism ^[1]. The majority of extremist attacks and domestic terrorism plots in the United States have been fueled by right-wing ideologies, with over 70% of such incidents attributed to this group since 2002 ^[3]. A comparative analysis found that since 1990, far-right extremists have committed more ideologically motivated attacks, resulting in more lives lost compared to far-left extremists ^[4]. The role of social media in amplifying political content also shows that the political right enjoys higher amplification compared to the political left ^[5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

• Lack of historical context: The analyses primarily focus on contemporary extremist groups, with limited discussion on the historical development of these movements ^[1].
• International comparisons: While some sources touch on global extremism ^[6], a more comprehensive international comparison could provide additional insights into the ideologies and tactics of far-left and far-right groups.
• Social media's impact: The audit of algorithmic amplification of political content on Twitter ^[5] suggests that social media platforms may inadvertently contribute to the spread of extremist ideologies, but this aspect requires further exploration.
• Diverse perspectives within groups: The analyses often generalize the ideologies and tactics of far-left and far-right groups, overlooking potential diversity within these movements ^{[2] [1]}.
• The role of government policies: Some sources hint at the influence of government policies on the perception and treatment of extremist groups ^[3], but a more detailed examination of this aspect is necessary.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement's framing may benefit those seeking to downplay the threat of far-right extremism by implying a balance between the dangers posed by far-left and far-right groups ^[1]. However, the analyses suggest that right-wing ideologies have been responsible for the majority of extremist attacks and domestic terrorism plots ^[3]. This discrepancy may indicate a bias in the original statement, potentially driven by political motivations or a lack of awareness about the prevalence of right-wing extremism ^[4]. Furthermore, the removal of a Justice Department study showing the superiority of far-right attacks ^[4] could be seen as an attempt to silence critics and stifle political dissent, benefiting those who wish to minimize the perceived threat of right-wing extremism ^{[3] [3]}.