How many violent incidents have been linked to far-right vs far-left ideologies in the US since 2020?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Was this fact-check helpful?
1. Summary of the results
The analyses provided suggest that right-wing extremists pose a significant terrorism threat in the US, accounting for 57% of all terrorist attacks and plots between 1994 and 2020 [1]. Similarly, another source reports that right-wing attacks and plots account for the majority of all terrorist incidents in the United States since 1994, with 57% of all attacks and plots during this period [2]. In contrast, left-wing terrorists committed 25% of all attacks and plots [2]. Left-wing radicals are less likely to engage in violent ideologically motivated acts compared to right-wing and Islamist radicals [2]. However, it is essential to note that political violence is a growing concern in the US, fueled by polarization, social media, and the availability of guns [3]. Since 2002, right-wing ideologies have fueled more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terror plots in the U.S. [1].
- Key findings include:
- Right-wing extremists pose a significant terrorism threat in the US [1] [2]
- Left-wing radicals are less likely to engage in violent ideologically motivated acts [2]
- Political violence is a growing concern in the US [3]
- Right-wing ideologies have fueled more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terror plots in the U.S. since 2002 [1]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original statement lacks specific data on the number of violent incidents linked to far-right vs far-left ideologies in the US since 2020. While the analyses provide some insight into the comparison of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists, there is limited information on the exact number of incidents since 2020 [3] [2]. Additionally, the sources primarily focus on the threat posed by right-wing extremists, with less emphasis on left-wing extremism [1]. Alternative viewpoints, such as the role of social media and polarization in fueling political violence, are also essential to consider [3]. Furthermore, the sources do not provide a comprehensive comparison of the ideologies, goals, tactics, membership, recruitment techniques, and involvement in violent criminal activity of left-wing and right-wing extremist groups [4].
- Missing context includes:
- Specific data on the number of violent incidents linked to far-right vs far-left ideologies in the US since 2020
- Emphasis on left-wing extremism
- The role of social media and polarization in fueling political violence
- A comprehensive comparison of left-wing and right-wing extremist groups
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The original statement may be biased towards implying a false equivalence between far-right and far-left ideologies. The analyses suggest that right-wing extremists pose a significant terrorism threat in the US, accounting for 57% of all terrorist attacks and plots between 1994 and 2020 [1]. In contrast, left-wing terrorists committed 25% of all attacks and plots [2]. This disparity may be lost in the original statement, which could be misleading. Additionally, the sources provided are primarily from think tanks and research organizations, which may have their own biases and agendas [3] [2]. It is crucial to consider the potential misinformation and bias in the original statement and the sources provided. The Trump administration's response to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, targeting far-left groups without evidence, may also be an example of misinformation and bias [5].
- Potential misinformation and bias include:
- Implying a false equivalence between far-right and far-left ideologies
- Biases and agendas of the sources provided
- The Trump administration's response to the assassination of Charlie Kirk [5]