Farage 350 million pledge for NHS

Checked on December 15, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Executive summary

Nigel Farage disavowed the Leave campaign’s prominent “£350 million a week for the NHS” claim immediately after the 2016 referendum, calling the promise a “mistake” and saying he could not guarantee the cash would go to health services [1] [2] [3]. The figure itself originated on Vote Leave bus branding and in Leave campaign messaging, but independent analysis and later reporting note the bus claim ignored rebates, EU spending in the UK and net contributions [4] [5].

1. The pledge that shaped the campaign — and who actually put it on the bus

The slogan “We send the EU £350 million a week, let’s fund our NHS instead” was emblazoned on the Vote Leave battle bus and used widely in Leave campaign literature; the bus claim served as a central and highly visible promise during the referendum campaign [4]. Vote Leave’s use of the £350m figure — attributed to gross UK contributions to the EU — became shorthand for the argument that leaving would free up large sums for domestic spending [4].

2. Immediate backtrack: Farage’s on-air repudiation

Within hours of the Leave victory, Nigel Farage told ITV’s Good Morning Britain that he could not and would not guarantee £350m a week for the NHS, saying the pledge “was one of the mistakes that I think the Leave campaign made” and that it “wasn’t one of my adverts” [1] [2] [3]. Video evidence shows Farage had earlier advocated repurposing EU cash for British services, yet he publicly distanced himself from the explicit bus-style pledge on results day [6].

3. Media and fact-checkers: the figure’s hidden math

Reporting and commentary at the time pointed out that the £350m figure was a gross amount that ignored UK receipts from the EU and other offsets; outlets concluded that the headline weekly number overstated what would actually be available to spend domestically [4] [5]. The Independent and Wikipedia sources make clear critics and analysts rejected the implication that £350m per week would be a straightforward surplus for the NHS [5] [4].

4. Political accountability and campaign roles

Farage emphasized he was not part of the official Vote Leave adverts and framed the pledge as originating from others in the Leave effort; several outlets reported he disassociated himself from the bus message while also having campaigned on similar themes about redirecting EU spending [1] [6] [3]. Journalistic accounts noted this distinction between different Leave groups and the public prominence of the Vote Leave material [3] [4].

5. What supporters and critics argued at the time

Supporters presented the £350m claim as a straightforward reclaiming of money “sent” to Brussels that could be spent on domestic priorities like the NHS [4]. Critics, and later commentators, argued the claim created a false choice by ignoring net contributions, rebates and EU spending returning to the UK, making the promised boost to the NHS unlikely to materialise [5] [4].

6. Subsequent iterations and fact-checking into 2025

Reporting and fact-check sites continued to reference the bus claim and Farage’s earlier comments; some watchdog and fact-check organisations have tracked repetitions of the slogan by politicians in later campaigns and reiterated that no weekly £350m surplus has materialised [7] [4]. Those later pieces underline that the original claim’s accounting flaws remained a subject of scrutiny beyond 2016 [7].

7. Limitations of available reporting and open questions

Available sources document Farage’s repudiation, the bus slogan’s prominence and critiques of the £350m calculation, but they do not provide a comprehensive, single audit showing exactly how much additional NHS funding — if any — was delivered as a direct result of Brexit policies; that precise accounting is “not found in current reporting” among the supplied sources [1] [4] [5]. Also, while later 2025 material reports Farage repeating the claim, the supplied sources do not fully quantify economic impacts attributable to Brexit [7].

8. Bottom line for readers

The claim that leaving the EU would free £350m a week for the NHS was a central Leave message carried on Vote Leave materials, but Nigel Farage publicly disowned the explicit pledge on referendum night and called it a mistake [1] [2] [6]. Multiple outlets and analysts at the time and since have shown the £350m figure was misleading because it used gross contributions without accounting for rebates and spending that returned to the UK [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What did Nigel Farage specifically propose spending the £350 million pledge on within the NHS?
Was the £350 million figure from Farage verified and how was it calculated?
How would a £350 million pledge impact NHS services compared with current funding levels in 2025?
Which political parties or figures supported or criticised Farage's £350 million NHS pledge and why?
Has any previous UK politician delivered a similar targeted NHS funding pledge and what were the outcomes?