Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: This site is a fascist apologist site

Checked on September 18, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The claim that the site is a fascist apologist site is supported by several analyses, including those from [1], which describes right-wing leaders and thinkers revealing white supremacism as an engine of their movement [1]. Additionally, [2] discusses the promotion of white supremacy in the US, including the White House's involvement, and criticizes The New York Times for lending its editorial page to white supremacy, supporting the claim that the site may be a fascist apologist site [2]. Furthermore, [3] examines the rise of right-wing podcaster Darryl Cooper, who has expressed Nazi apologia and Holocaust skepticism, and notes that Cooper's views have been boosted by high-profile figures like Elon Musk and Sen. JD Vance, which supports the claim that the site may be a fascist apologist site [3]. However, other analyses, such as [4] and [5], report on the White House condemnation of Tucker Carlson's interview with Darryl Cooper and the backlash against Carlson for platforming Cooper, suggesting that the site may not be a fascist apologist site as it reports on criticism of fascist ideologies [4] [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key context missing from the original statement includes the fact that the site may not be explicitly promoting fascist ideologies, but rather providing a platform for figures who have expressed fascist or white supremacist views, as noted in [3] [3]. Alternative viewpoints, such as those presented in [6], [7], and [8], provide a broader understanding of fascism, its history, and its appeal, which can help to contextualize the claim that the site is a fascist apologist site [6] [7] [8]. For example, [6] discusses the parallels between the rise of fascism in Europe in the 1920s and '30s and contemporary American democracy, highlighting the role of economic crisis, social change, and charismatic leaders in fueling anti-democratic movements [6]. Additionally, [7] examines the definition of fascism, its key characteristics, and why it remains a relevant and appealing ideology, with experts weighing in on whether Donald Trump's leadership style and policies align with fascist tendencies [7]. The following are some of the key points to consider:

  • The site's platforming of figures with fascist or white supremacist views, as noted in [3] [3]
  • The White House condemnation of Tucker Carlson's interview with Darryl Cooper, as reported in [4] [4]
  • The backlash against Tucker Carlson for platforming Darryl Cooper, as reported in [5] [5]
  • The historical context of fascism, as discussed in [6], [7], and [8] [6] [7] [8]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement that the site is a fascist apologist site may be subject to potential misinformation or bias, as it does not provide a nuanced understanding of the site's content or the context in which it operates, as noted in [3] [3]. The statement may benefit those who seek to criticize the site and its alleged promotion of fascist ideologies, such as liberal or progressive groups, as discussed in [2] [2]. On the other hand, the statement may be detrimental to those who seek to defend the site and its content, such as conservative or right-wing groups, as reported in [4] and [5] [4] [5]. Some of the parties that may benefit from this framing include:

  • Liberal or progressive groups, who may use the statement to criticize the site and its alleged promotion of fascist ideologies [2]
  • Conservative or right-wing groups, who may use the statement to defend the site and its content, and to criticize the original statement as an example of liberal or progressive bias [4] [5]
  • Figures like Darryl Cooper, who have expressed fascist or white supremacist views, and who may benefit from the attention and platform provided by the site, as noted in [3] [3]
Want to dive deeper?
What are the characteristics of fascist ideology?
How do fascist apologist sites spread misinformation?
What are the consequences of promoting fascist ideologies online?
Can fascist apologist sites be held accountable for hate speech?
How do social media platforms regulate fascist content?