Is it true that in FBI reports that Donald Trump measured girls genitals by inserting fingers and raping tightness before auctioning them off
Executive summary
The specific claim—that FBI reports show Donald Trump "measured girls' genitals by inserting fingers and rating tightness before auctioning them off"—does appear among materials in the Justice Department's recently released Epstein-related files, but those entries are anonymous or second‑hand tips and have been characterized by the DOJ and reporters as uncorroborated and frequently deemed not credible [1] [2] [3]. In short: the allegation exists in the released documents as an unverified tip, not as an established, proven fact substantiated by FBI findings or court rulings [3] [4].
1. What the released FBI/DOJ documents actually contain
Multiple media organizations reviewed the DOJ’s Epstein files and republished summaries showing that at least one email or NTOC (National Threat Operations Center) entry relayed an allegation that girls were "auctioned" at parties and that an anonymous caller claimed Trump measured girls’ vulvas/vaginas by penetrating them with a finger and rating tightness; those specific phrasing and claims appear in outlets summarizing the newly released FBI materials [1] [5] [2].
2. How federal officials describe those entries
The Department of Justice has explicitly warned that the mass production of Epstein-related materials contains tips submitted by the public that may include "fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos," and that some documents contain "untrue and sensationalist claims"—language DOJ used to caution readers that inclusion in the archive is not an endorsement of credibility [2] [4] [1].
3. Credibility and investigatory status of the tips
Reporting on the files makes clear many of the items were anonymous, second‑hand, or otherwise not investigable, and DOJ officials and task forces noted they could not follow up on numerous leads because callers left no contact information or provided unverifiable second‑hand accounts; outlets say investigators deemed many of the allegations not credible or unable to be corroborated [3] [6] [7].
4. Distinction between entries in a tips database and proven allegations
Journalistic summaries and DOJ commentary uniformly distinguish between raw tips included in the NTOC archive and substantiated investigative findings: the presence of a claim in an FBI email or tip file is not the same as an FBI conclusion of guilt, indictment, or court finding, and several news pieces and the DOJ emphasize that the documents are a mix of leads, some of which were never validated [3] [4] [2].
5. Related verified legal findings about Trump and sexual misconduct (context, not a conflation)
Separately from the Epstein file tips, there are established civil and criminal matters involving allegations against Donald Trump: for example, in litigation involving writer E. Jean Carroll, a judge noted a jury’s finding that Trump had forcibly penetrated Carroll with his fingers—language tied to a civil judgment for sexual abuse and defamation—yet that ruling pertains to Carroll’s claim and a civil jury, not to the auction/measurement allegations in the Epstein NTOC entries [8].
6. Bottom line and limits of available reporting
Available reporting shows the exact sensational allegation about measuring girls’ genitals with fingers and "rating" them does appear in the released Epstein-related FBI materials as an anonymous/unverified tip and has been echoed in multiple news outlets [1] [5] [2], but DOJ statements and reporting make plain those items were not authenticated evidence and many leads were judged not credible or could not be investigated further [3] [4]; there is no public record in these releases that transforms that specific tip into a corroborated FBI finding or criminal charge. The reporting also contains corroborated, separate allegations against Trump in other contexts (e.g., Carroll) that should not be conflated with these anonymous archive entries [8].