Has FIFA given awards or honors to U.S. presidents or politicians before?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
FIFA has in 2025 created a new FIFA Peace Prize and awarded its inaugural prize to U.S. President Donald Trump on Dec. 5, 2025 during the 2026 World Cup draw in Washington, D.C.; FIFA did not publicly disclose nominees or a formal selection process for the award [1][2]. The decision prompted formal complaints to FIFA’s ethics investigators and criticism that FIFA’s president, Gianni Infantino, bypassed normal governance channels and violated political‑neutrality norms [3][4].
1. FIFA’s precedent: a newly created prize and a first-ever presidential recipient
FIFA established the FIFA Peace Prize in 2025 and presented the inaugural award to President Donald Trump at the World Cup draw on Dec. 5, 2025 — an act reported across outlets including AP, CNN and The Athletic [1][5][2]. The prize itself was unveiled only weeks earlier as part of FIFA’s “Football Unites the World” campaign and FIFA described it as an annual recognition for “unwavering commitment” to peace and unity, but gave few details about how winners would be chosen [6][2].
2. Governance questions: process, council input and neutrality concerns
Multiple reports say FIFA did not disclose nominees or a clear selection mechanism for the prize, and that the award was created without prior approval from the FIFA Council, raising governance red flags [2][6]. Critics — and at least one formal complaint to FIFA’s ethics committee — argue awarding a prize to a sitting political leader breaches FIFA’s duty of neutrality; a human‑rights group and others have petitioned ethics investigators to review whether Infantino violated FIFA rules [3][4].
3. Infantino’s role and the appearance of partisanship
News outlets and watchdogs note Gianni Infantino’s public expressions of support for Trump before the award — including social media posts saying Trump “definitely” deserved recognition — and that Infantino personally presented the medal on stage, which intensified concerns about impartiality [5][6]. Politico and other reporting cited by Snopes suggested Infantino bypassed standard council discussions, with vice presidents reportedly informed only after decisions were taken [7].
4. Media and political reaction: satire, skepticism and partisan spin
The prize drew immediate political and cultural response: late‑night hosts mocked the award, conservative outlets framed it as validation, and mainstream outlets highlighted the oddity of FIFA — traditionally focused on sport — creating a peace prize and giving it to a politician with a long‑running taste for international accolades [8][9][10]. Reporting emphasized the lack of transparency around selection and the timing at a high‑profile event in the U.S. capital [2][5].
5. Broader context: FIFA’s past behavior and why this matters
FIFA has a documented history of controversy over governance and political entanglement; that institutional backdrop magnifies concern when its president bestows a new political award without clear process. Investigations and complaints now test whether FIFA’s internal rules on neutrality and council oversight will be enforced, or whether the organization’s actions will be treated as an internal prerogative [6][4].
6. What this does — and doesn’t — prove about prior practice
Available sources document this 2025 instance as the first time FIFA created and awarded its own Peace Prize to a sitting U.S. president; they do not describe any prior FIFA awards to U.S. presidents or equivalent political figures, nor do they say FIFA historically gave honors to sitting politicians in comparable fashion [6][2]. If you seek a catalogue of earlier presidential honors by FIFA, available sources do not mention other examples.
7. Competing interpretations and what to watch next
Supporters argue FIFA’s prize recognizes diplomatic contributions and that Infantino acted within his remit to raise football’s global profile [2]. Critics see political favoritism and procedural bypassing that could trigger disciplinary review [3][4]. Watch for outcomes of the ethics complaints, any FIFA Council statements, and whether FIFA publishes formal nomination or adjudication rules for future prizes — those actions will determine if this becomes an institutional norm or a one‑off controversy [6][7].
Limitations: reporting in the supplied sources is limited to the creation and first awarding of the FIFA Peace Prize and reactions through early December 2025; available sources do not provide a comprehensive history of any earlier FIFA honors to U.S. presidents beyond this case [6][2].