What financial disclosures exist for Political Revolution and other partner groups that supported 50501 events?

1. Who the reporting identifies as partners — and where that claim comes from

InfluenceWatch’s profile of the 50501 Movement lists Political Revolution, No Voice Unheard, Voices of Florida (a 501(c) per the profile) and Build The Resistance as partners and notes an early joint statement with Political Revolution on February 5, 2025 ^[1]. The 50501 movement’s own materials and partner pages likewise name Political Revolution and No Voice Unheard among groups providing coordination or platforms for local hubs ^{[2] [5]}. Wikipedia’s movement summary likewise records an early partnership with Political Revolution ^[3]. These multiple, independent‑looking references establish who the movement and third‑party trackers consider core partner organizations ^{[1] [3] [2]}.

2. What the movement itself says about structure and centralized finances

The 50501 site explicitly states the movement is “first and foremost a movement of, by, and for the people” and asserts it is not nationally incorporated and has “no plans to change that,” language that implies an absence of a single entity that would issue consolidated financial disclosures ^[4]. That framing appears in the movement’s public-facing partner page and is repeated in the broader site materials describing decentralized coordination and local hubs ^{[5] [4]}. Reporting that relies on the movement’s own materials therefore documents an organizational claim that complicates finding a single disclosure for the entire effort ^[4].

3. What the available reporting does not provide: financial filings or audit trails

None of the provided sources include copies, summaries, or links to FEC filings, IRS forms, state campaign finance reports, or audited financial statements for Political Revolution, No Voice Unheard, Voices of Florida, Build The Resistance, or any 50501 entity; the InfluenceWatch profile and partner pages describe relationships and activities but stop short of publishing financial disclosure documents ^{[1] [2] [5]}. Similarly, the movement’s public messaging emphasizes decentralized activism rather than centralized fundraising transparency, and the reviewed reporting does not claim to have obtained independent accounting or disclosure records ^{[4] [1]}.

4. Credibility caveats and potential agendas in the sources

InfluenceWatch, one of the sources, curates organizational profiles and sometimes emphasizes partisanship in its descriptions; readers should note that such trackers can reflect editorial choices about which facts to highlight ^[1]. The movement’s own materials naturally frame the story to emphasize grassroots decentralization, which can serve both as a political virtue and as a practical explanation for why centralized disclosures aren’t presented ^{[4] [5]}. Build The Resistance’s event page likewise promotes partner ties and logistical support but doesn’t publish finance documents in the material reviewed ^[2]. These source characteristics suggest implicit agendas: third‑party watchdogs aim to categorize influence while movement and partner pages aim to recruit and coordinate; neither provided transparent financial evidence in the selected reporting ^{[1] [4] [2]}.

5. Bottom line and reporting limitation

Based on the documents reviewed, there is clear, consistent reporting that Political Revolution and several groups were partners of 50501, but the sources contain no direct financial disclosures or accounting records for Political Revolution or the listed partner organizations connected to 50501 events ^{[1] [3] [2] [4]}. This answer is limited to the supplied reporting; locating formal financial disclosures would require follow‑up searches of public finance repositories, campaign/charity filing databases, or direct requests to the organizations, none of which are present in the provided sources.