Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What roles did former Fox News employees hold in the Trump administration?
Executive summary
President Trump’s second administration has recruited a large number of current and former Fox News on-air personalities and contributors, with outlets reporting at least 23 hires or nominations by spring 2025 (The Independent; Newsweek) [1] [2]. Coverage lists high-profile placements that include cabinet-level posts such as Pete Hegseth at Defense and Sean Duffy at Transportation, and many other on-air hosts moved into senior White House, agency and DOJ roles (BBC; Deadline; Newsweek) [3] [4] [2].
1. The visible pipeline: Fox personalities in top Cabinet and agency jobs
Reporting across multiple outlets documents that former Fox hosts and contributors have filled headline jobs in Trump’s second administration — for example, Pete Hegseth, a Fox host and military veteran, was confirmed as defense secretary; Sean Duffy, a former Fox Business host and ex-congressman, was tapped to run Transportation; and Jeanine Pirro, a longtime Fox host, was appointed interim U.S. attorney for D.C. — all cited in mainstream coverage [3] [5] [1]. Deadline and BBC enumerate numerous TV figures moved into senior posts or nominations, showing the shift from punditry to governing roles [4] [3].
2. How many and who: tallies and sample names reported
The Independent, Newsweek and Poynter each report that roughly two dozen — often cited as “at least 23” — current or former Fox employees have been appointed or nominated to Trump’s administration by mid‑2025, and media lists (Deadline, The Hill) catalog many individuals, including hosts, contributors and occasional guests who crossed into government jobs [1] [2] [6] [4] [5]. Available articles name specific examples (Pirro, Hegseth, Duffy, Morgan Ortagus, Monica Crowley, Tom Homan) but do not provide a single universally agreed list in the provided search set [4] [1] [5].
3. The pattern: loyalty, visibility and the “public-facing” argument
Commentators and media analysts emphasize a pattern: Trump has repeatedly recruited television figures who spoke glowingly of him or acted as surrogates on-air, valuing visibility and loyalty alongside policy experience. Poynter and The New York Times point out Trump’s reliance on TV personalities and a preference for “public-facing” team members who can communicate his message [6] [7]. Accountable.US and Media Matters emphasize the revolving-door nature between Fox and the administration, suggesting a strategic staffing pipeline [8] [9].
4. Policy implications flagged by reporting: Project 2025 and civil‑service change
Some outlets connect Fox-friendly hires to broader policy efforts tied to Project 2025 and ambitions to reshape the federal workforce — for example, Fox-affiliated figures like Morgan Ortagus and Project 2025 contributors have advocated downsizing or reclassifying career civil servants, an agenda highlighted by Media Matters and related reporting [9]. Reporting indicates this is not merely personnel preference but dovetails with policy goals favored by some hires [9].
5. Competing perspectives in the press: qualifications vs. loyalty
Coverage contains competing frames: defenders argue that TV veterans bring communication skills and public trust (The New York Times notes Trump values “public-facing” staff) while critics and watchdogs question qualifications, ethics and the risks of populating government with media loyalists [7] [8]. Outlets such as Accountable.US and The Hill stress concerns about loyalty-over-expertise and the consequences for governance; Poynter frames the phenomenon as unsurprising given Trump’s dependence on Fox programming [8] [5] [6].
6. Limitations and gaps in available reporting
Available sources in this set emphasize counts and illustrative names but do not publish a single authoritative, fully detailed roster that I can cite here; individual pieces overlap but vary in who they list and how they classify “Fox employees” (full-time hosts vs. occasional contributors) [1] [2] [4]. If you want a named, verifiable list of all 23+ individuals with their exact job titles and confirmation status, available sources do not present one consolidated table in the provided results [1] [2] [4].
7. What to watch next
Follow-up reporting to watch includes confirmation hearings, watchdog tallies (e.g., Accountable.US, Media Matters), and mainstream outlets updating nomination/appointment counts; those will clarify which hires are Senate‑confirmed versus interim or advisory, and whether the pattern spreads deeper into career civil‑service ranks [8] [9] [4].