Have any former U.S. presidents been convicted after leaving office and when did convictions occur?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
One former U.S. president has been criminally convicted after leaving office: Donald J. Trump, who was found guilty by a Manhattan jury on 34 counts of falsifying business records in late May 2024 (reported as a historic first) [1] [2]. Before that, no former U.S. president had ever been convicted of a crime after leaving the White House; the closest comparable episodes involved resignations, pardons or convictions of aides and associates rather than the president himself [3] [4].
1. A U.S. first: Trump’s conviction and when it happened
A Manhattan jury returned guilty verdicts against former President Donald Trump on 34 felony counts tied to falsified business records related to payments described in reporting as "hush money," with major outlets identifying the verdict date at the end of May 2024 and noting it as the first time a former U.S. president was criminally convicted [1] [2] [5].
2. What earlier scandals produced — convictions for aides, not presidents
Historic U.S. scandals illustrate that criminal accountability has often reached the president’s circle rather than the president: Watergate produced dozens charged and dozens of guilty pleas and convictions among Nixon aides, while Richard Nixon himself resigned and was then pardoned by Gerald Ford, ending the prospect of a criminal charge against him [4] [3] [6].
3. Legal context: immunity, impeachment and prosecution after office
The Constitution provides no blanket immunity for former officials once they leave office, and legal authorities and courts have long recognized that criminal prosecution of ex‑presidents is legally possible; DOJ policy historically has declined to criminally indict a sitting president, but that protection does not extend after the term ends [7] [8]. The Supreme Court has also rejected the argument that impeachment is a required precursor to criminal prosecution, making post‑term prosecutions legally distinct from impeachment processes [8].
4. Why the distinction between impeachment and criminal conviction matters
Impeachment is a political removal mechanism carried out by Congress and can lead to disqualification from future office, while criminal trials pursue penalties under criminal law — they are separate tracks; past presidents have been impeached without criminal convictions, and some administrations saw aides prosecuted criminally even when the president was not charged [9] [4].
5. International context and media framing
News organizations and analysts framed the Trump conviction as a U.S. historical milestone and placed it in a global pattern of ex‑leaders prosecuted or jailed in other countries — reporting compared the case to convictions of ex‑leaders abroad while noting that such prosecutions are far more common internationally than they have been in U.S. history [1] [5].
6. Limits of the record and open questions
Available reporting documents the Trump conviction as the first criminal conviction of a former U.S. president and records earlier close calls (pardons, resignations) and prosecutions of aides, but sources provided do not furnish exhaustive court documents, sentencing outcomes beyond headline convictions, or later appellate developments in every case; those details require consulting primary court records or later reporting [1] [3] [2].