What is the full official list of House Democrats who cosponsored Robin Kelly’s articles of impeachment against Kristi Noem?
Executive summary
The authoritative, official source for the full list of House Democrats who cosponsored Rep. Robin Kelly’s articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is Rep. Kelly’s own office: her press release and cosponsor list published on her congressional website [1] [2]. News outlets published counts and partial lists, but reporting varies—some outlets report roughly 70 cosponsors, others report larger or growing totals—so the single definitive roster in this moment is the list released by Kelly’s office [1] [3].
1. What the sponsor’s office says: where the official list lives and what it shows
Rep. Robin Kelly formally introduced three articles of impeachment against Secretary Noem and published a cosponsor list on her official House website and in related press materials; those materials are the primary, official public record for who has signed on as cosponsors [1] [2]. Kelly’s explanatory press release accompanying the introduction describes the three articles—obstruction of Congress, violation of public trust, and self-dealing—and states the number of cosponsors at the time of posting [1] [4]. Any counting or roster discrepancies in subsequent reporting should be measured against that official Kelly Office posting [1].
2. Conflicting counts in the press: 70, 69, 100—what reporters published
Contemporary coverage shows inconsistent totals: multiple mainstream outlets reported that roughly 70 House Democrats had cosponsored the impeachment resolution when it was filed (reported as 70 or 69 by The Hill, Time, CBS Chicago, and others) [5] [4] [6] [7], while a Kelly press release snippet circulated elsewhere asserted a larger number—100—as the cosponsor tally in follow-up communications [2]. Newsweek and other outlets said “more than 50” or published a full list of signers in their stories [8] [3]. These variations reflect either different snapshots in time, editorial aggregation of Kelly’s published roster, or divergent press summaries rather than a single consolidated official correction [2] [1] [3].
3. Why the discrepancy matters: official record vs. media aggregation
Impeachment cosponsor rosters are dynamic: members may add their names after introduction, offices update lists at different cadences, and journalists may report counts based on partial lists or their own tallies [1] [3]. The safest practice for a definitive roster is to consult the sponsor’s congressional office posting or the House’s legislative cosponsor records; Rep. Kelly’s media materials explicitly publish the names and a contemporaneous count, making them the primary source when cross-checking reportage [1] [2].
4. Political context and competing narratives around the cosponsors
Coverage uniformly frames the cosponsor surge as a partisan push in response to the fatal ICE-involved shooting in Minneapolis and broader concerns about DHS conduct—language reflected in Kelly’s statements and in outlet summaries of her allegations of obstruction, public-trust violations, and self-dealing [5] [4] [9]. DHS and Noem’s allies dismissed the effort as political posturing; a DHS spokesperson called Kelly’s move “silly” and characterized it as showmanship, an explicit counter-narrative reported across outlets [5]. That public dispute and differing counts amplify why relying on the sponsor’s published list is critical [1] [5].
5. Best practice for verification and next steps for researchers
To obtain the verbatim, full roster of cosponsors at a precise point in time, consult Rep. Robin Kelly’s official cosponsor list on her congressional website or the House’s legislative database; Kelly’s press releases accompanying the filing are the direct source for the names and the cosponsorship count that her office certified at publication [1] [2]. Where press stories list names (for example Newsweek and other outlets), use those as secondary confirmations but cross-check against Kelly’s official posting for the final authoritative list [3].