Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What is the itemized funding list for the FY2025 clean CR?
Executive Summary
The FY2025 “clean” continuing resolution (CR) preserves most FY2024 spending levels across the 12 regular appropriations titles while carrying a set of specified exceptions and anomalies that alter particular accounts; the CR’s baseline equals roughly $1.60 trillion in base discretionary budget authority, divided between defense and nondefense allocations [1]. There is no single consolidated, line‑by‑line “itemized” list inside the CR; instead the statute continuing-approves FY2024 appropriations and references prior enacted bills, with targeted changes that require cross‑referencing the CR text to the underlying FY2024 appropriations acts to produce a complete, itemized accounting [2] [3].
1. Why You Can’t Find One Flat “Itemized” Spreadsheet — Lawmakers Kept FY24 Numbers in Place
The clean CR functions primarily by carrying forward FY2024 appropriations authorities and amounts into FY2025, meaning Congress did not recompile every account into a new, single schedule; the CR glues FY24 enactments into FY25 unless it explicitly amends them, so an “itemized funding list” exists implicitly across the 12 prior appropriations acts rather than as a single novel table in the CR text. Analysts note that the law also contains multiple anomalies and carve‑outs—language that changes specific accounts or creates directed exceptions—so producing an accurate itemized list requires extracting the CR’s instructions and applying them to the original FY2024 statutes and explanatory tables [1] [2]. The Congressional Budget Office’s topline estimates are useful for context, but they are not a substitute for a line item reconciliation of the underlying appropriations acts [1].
2. Topline Totals You Can Rely On — The CR’s Aggregate Spending Picture
Independent and congressional summaries converge on the same headline: the CR provides roughly $1.60 trillion in base discretionary budget authority for FY2025, split between about $892–895 billion for defense and $707–711 billion for nondefense; these are the figures used in cap enforcement and budget scorekeeping [1] [4]. Those topline numbers are the most reliable single‑figure characterization of the clean CR because they reflect the statutory cap framework and the CR’s carryover rule for FY2024 appropriations. Observers should treat these totals as the budgetary ceiling for discretionary spending rather than an itemized allocation to specific programs, because program‑level amounts are inherited from FY2024 statutes and subject to the CR’s listed exceptions [1].
3. What the CR Explicitly Changes — Anomalies, Extensions, and Rescissions to Watch
Although the CR largely continues prior law, it lists explicit anomalies and policy exceptions that adjust funding levels, rescind previously provided amounts, or extend authorities (for example, specific sums added or rescinded under Commerce, Justice, Science, and Financial Services headings referenced in the CR). These targeted provisions are where the CR departs from a straight carryforward and where analysts must perform line‑by‑line comparisons to determine net increases or decreases to particular accounts. Multiple analyses emphasize that the CR references and amends several FY2024 appropriations acts and that some program funding—such as certain USDA nutrition programs or specific NIH and defense program accounts—may have bespoke figures embedded in those cross‑references, requiring cross‑document reconciliation [2] [3].
4. Practical Steps to Build a True Itemized List — Cross‑Reference and Reconcile
To compile a definitive itemized funding list you must [5] obtain the full text of the CR, [6] identify every referenced FY2024 appropriations act and statutory section, and [7] apply the CR’s amendments, anomalies, rescissions, and extensions to those underlying appropriations. Multiple sources stress that the CR’s internal language does not amount to a consolidated schedule; instead, the complete line‑by‑line picture emerges only after reconciling the CR with the twelve FY2024 appropriations statutes and budget exhibits. Agencies’ operating plans and OMB/GAO scorekeeping outputs are also necessary to confirm intra‑account transfers and to reflect mandatory or permanently appropriated authorities that the CR leaves intact [2].
5. Conflicting Coverage and Where To Look Next — Sources and Motives
Published summaries converge on the topline but vary in detail: Congressional summaries and scorekeepers emphasize cap totals and legal mechanics, while PDF section‑by‑section drafts highlight specific anomalies that interest particular stakeholders—defense, agriculture, health—each with advocates seeking favorable readouts. Expect partisan and stakeholder spin: proponents emphasize predictability and cap compliance; critics spotlight targeted add‑ons or rescissions. For an authoritative, itemized product, consult the CR text plus the twelve FY2024 appropriations statutes and OMB/GAO scorekeeping tables and then validate with agency operating plans [1] [2] [4].