What is the status of presidential signatures for the FY2026 minibus bills passed by both chambers as of Jan. 24, 2026?

1. Passage on Capitol Hill and transmission to the White House

Congress completed bicameral action on the three‑bill minibus in mid‑January: the House passed the package on January 8 and the Senate followed with an 82–15 vote on January 15, after which multiple organizations and committee offices reported the measure was headed to the President for signature ^{[1] [3] [2]}. Advocacy and trade groups, as well as congressional appropriations offices, have since treated the bills as the legislative vehicle that would require only the President’s assent to become law, reflecting the conventional post‑passage path for appropriations measures ^{[6] [7]}.

2. Reporting language: “sent to” vs. “signed by” — the difference matters

Several sources explicitly use the phrasing that the package was “sent to President Trump for his signature” or that it “now go(es) to President Trump to be signed into law,” which indicates formal transmission but not confirmation of a presidential signature ^{[1] [2] [3]}. Other outlets emphasize the conditional nature of enactment — for example, SpacePolicyOnline characterized the package as “very close to getting this minibus enacted if Trump agrees,” signaling that at least some reporting viewed a signature as likely but not yet executed ^[4]. Government Executive likewise described the practical effect if the President signs, noting that with this minibus and an earlier package the administration would have half the annual appropriations enacted — language that frames signature as the remaining step rather than a completed one ^[5].

3. Signals from supporters and opponents about timing and expectations

House Republican messaging projected quick action, with committee communications and industry groups expressing expectations that the President would sign the bill “next week,” reflecting an eagerness to close out half of the 12 appropriations bills ^[6]. Conversely, some reporting flagged procedural or political hurdles elsewhere in appropriations business — including unresolved decisions about remaining bills and internal House dynamics — which could affect timing ^{[8] [9]}. Those perspectives underscore that while the three‑bill minibus was positioned for signature, other calendar and political pressures made immediate enactment not automatic ^[8].

4. What the sources do not show and why that’s decisive

Crucially, none of the provided pieces contain a definitive statement that President Trump actually signed the three‑bill minibus into law as of January 24, 2026; the record offered consists of post‑passage transmissions, expectations, and conditional phrasing but not a signed statute or statement from the White House confirming enactment ^{[1] [4] [2]}. Because the difference between being “sent to” and being “signed by” the President determines whether appropriations are legally in force, the absence of a cited signature in the available reporting means the status remains: passed by both chambers and awaiting or expected to receive the President’s signature, but not verifiably signed in the sources provided ^{[1] [4] [2]}.

5. Bottom line and reporting caveat

The best, evidence‑based conclusion supported by the assembled reporting is that as of January 24, 2026 the FY2026 three‑bill minibus had cleared Congress and been transmitted to President Trump for signature, with contemporaneous coverage framing a presidential signature as the final step yet to be publicly documented in these sources; no source in the set confirms the signature itself ^{[1] [3] [2]}. If a reader needs legal certainty about enactment, the available reporting stops short of that confirmation and a check of official White House or enacted‑law records after January 24 would be required to determine whether the President ultimately signed the bills into law.