Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Are there any credible sources confirming or denying George Soros' involvement with the No Kings protests?
Executive Summary
A review of the available reporting shows no definitive, independently corroborated evidence that George Soros personally organized or directly coordinated the "No Kings" protests; claims of Soros funding point mainly to grant relationships between philanthropic vehicles and advocacy groups, while several mainstream outlets report no direct Soros role. The most prominent assertion tying Soros to the protests appears in Fox News reporting of October 16, 2025, citing grants to Indivisible and statements by Senator Ted Cruz, whereas other outlets either do not mention Soros or note the accusation without evidence [1] [2] [3].
1. Who is saying Soros is involved — and what exactly they claim?
Fox News reported on October 16, 2025, that Open Society Foundations provided grants, including a two-year $3 million award to Indivisible, and that Sen. Ted Cruz characterized the "No Kings" protests as "organized by Soros operatives and funded by Soros money," implying operational control and funding ties [1]. The Center Square published an earlier claim on September 25, 2025, that the Open Society Foundations had given over $80 million to groups alleged to be "tied to terrorism or extremist violence," a broader assertion about grant recipients rather than the specific "No Kings" protests [4]. Socialist Worker noted Cruz’s accusation and warned it invoked an antisemitic trope, while not providing independent evidence [3].
2. Which outlets do not corroborate the allegation and what do they report?
Newsweek, reporting on the October 18, 2025 nationwide demonstrations, described large turnout and participation by mayors and local leaders but did not report any Soros involvement; it framed the events as grassroots political opposition to President Trump [2]. The Financial Times coverage focused on how Trump's threats against Soros chilled nonprofit activity and referenced broader consequences for civil-society funding, but did not connect Soros to operational control of the "No Kings" protests [5]. Forbes material in the packet was unrelated and contributed no evidence for or against the claim [6].
3. What evidence is actually presented linking Soros or his foundations to the protests?
The most concrete item cited in support of involvement is a grant relationship: Open Society Foundations’ grant to Indivisible is mentioned as funding for data and communications activities related to the protests, per Fox News reporting [1]. That constitutes a financial link to an organization involved in organizing or supporting protest infrastructure, but it does not establish that Soros or Open Society directly organized, directed, or coordinated the protests. The Center Square’s $80 million figure alleges funding to problematic groups but provides no direct linkage to the "No Kings" demonstrations [4].
4. How do source perspectives and possible agendas shape their claims?
Fox News' report amplifies a political narrative tied to conservative criticism of Soros and was paired with a senator’s accusation, which may reflect an adversarial agenda toward prominent liberal funders [1]. The Center Square’s framing of grants as tied to "extremist violence" aligns with a skeptical posture toward progressive philanthropy [4]. Conversely, Newsweek and Financial Times report focus on protest scale or the chilling effect on nonprofits, without echoing the allegation; those outlets’ omission suggests either lack of evidence or editorial caution about repeating unverified claims [2] [5].
5. How consistent is the timeline of reporting and is any new corroboration available?
The Center Square piece predates the Fox News article, published September 25, 2025, asserting broad grant activity from Open Society [4]. Fox’s October 16, 2025 article advanced a claim tying a specific grant to Indivisible’s role in the October protests [1]. Newsweek’s October 18, 2025 coverage of the demonstrations did not corroborate the funding claim and came after Fox’s report [2]. Financial Times’ October 6, 2025 reporting on threats against Soros focused on effects on nonprofits but did not report direct protest links, indicating no independent corroboration emerged in the immediate days after the Fox claim [5].
6. What can be concluded about credibility and remaining uncertainties?
Based on the provided sources, there is credible documentation that Open Society Foundations have made grants to advocacy groups such as Indivisible, and there are public accusations from political figures and some outlets alleging a funding link to the "No Kings" protests [1] [4]. However, no source in the set provides independently verified evidence that Soros or his foundations organized or directly coordinated the protests, and mainstream coverage of the events often omits the allegation [2] [5]. The distinction between grant-making and operational coordination remains the central unresolved factual question.
7. What should readers watch for next and how to evaluate future claims?
Future verification should come from primary documents—grant agreements, organizational financial disclosures, or contemporaneous communications—or from investigative reporting that traces funds to specific protest activity; absent that, claims remain assertions rather than established facts [1] [4]. Readers should scrutinize who benefits from amplifying either the link or its denial: political actors may weaponize funding narratives, and outlets may vary in corroboration standards. Keep monitoring mainstream investigative outlets and filings from the involved NGOs for documentary corroboration before treating the allegation as proven [1] [5].