Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Which specific programs and initiatives have received the most funding from George Soros through the Open Society Foundations?
Executive Summary
The available documents do not identify a clear, ranked list of the specific programs that received the most funding from George Soros through the Open Society Foundations (OSF); they instead describe broad funding areas and several notable grants and initiatives. OSF funding is concentrated in democracy and human-rights work, education, independent media, public health, arts and culture, and internet commons projects, with cited examples including a $1.2 billion disbursement in 2024, a $100 million science grant, support for Wikimedia and Central European University, and seed grants for free and open source internet projects [1] [2] [3] [4].
1. Why the question of “most-funded programs” remains unanswered — the public record is descriptive, not ranked
The assembled sources consistently describe the scope of OSF funding without producing a transparent ranking of which programs received the largest allocations. One source reports that OSF provided $1.2 billion in funding in 2024, noting support for artists, curators, human-rights organizations and democracy work, but it does not break down allocations by program to show which received the most [1]. Another article catalogs broad policy and civil-society targets — social justice, education, public health and independent media — again without the granular, comparable figures needed to determine “most-funded” initiatives [2]. This pattern creates a factual gap: the claim that particular programs are the top recipients cannot be substantiated from these items alone.
2. Documented large grants and initiatives that reliably appear in coverage
Several specific grants and programmatic focuses recur across sources and thus merit emphasis as significant OSF investments. Coverage cites a $100 million donation to support scientific research in former Soviet states, intended to create an International Science Foundation for merit-based grants to scientists [3]. OSF has also funded educational institutions and independent media, explicitly including support to the Wikimedia Foundation and Central European University, and has long-standing fellowship and cultural grants referenced in the reporting [2]. The existence of these sizable and named efforts demonstrates targeted, high-profile allocations even if their place in a ranked list is unresolved.
3. Newer, targeted investments: reclaiming the internet and university networks
Recent reporting documents OSF funding directed at digital commons and higher-education collaboration. The NGI Zero Commons Fund supported 42 free and open source projects aimed at reclaiming the public nature of the internet, a concrete program-level investment credited in coverage [4]. The Open Society University Network is described as a vehicle offering calls for proposals, courses and fellowships — a structured, multi-institutional initiative — although the sources do not quantify its budget or compare it against other programs [5]. These items underscore OSF’s strategic work on technology and academic networks as notable funding channels.
4. Political context shapes reporting and may skew perceived priorities
Coverage from late 2025 highlights political pressure on OSF — notably threats from the Trump administration to investigate and potentially revoke tax-exempt status — and documents consequent fear among smaller nonprofits that rely on OSF support [6]. That reporting emphasizes how political attacks can dominate the narrative, shifting attention away from program-by-program funding details and toward the defensive posture of grantees. This suggests that contemporaneous reporting may spotlight institutional survival and legal threats rather than transparent grant accounting, complicating efforts to identify largest-funded programs purely from news reports.
5. Conflicting emphases and what each source privileges in coverage
The available pieces show varied emphases: one highlights broad art and culture fellowships and aggregate spending in 2024 without granular detail [1]; another focuses on chilling political effects and organizational vulnerability rather than funding specifics [6]; a Japanese-language summary lists mission areas and named grantees like Wikimedia and CEU [2]. The NGI Zero story provides one program-level example of multiple grantees [4]. These differing angles reveal that media coverage prioritizes institutional narratives, political context, or particular projects rather than systematic fund-level transparency, which constrains firm conclusions.
6. What can be stated with confidence from the available materials
From the supplied sources, it is factual that OSF disbursed $1.2 billion in 2024, has funded arts fellowships, human-rights and democracy organizations, independent media, education (including CEU), open-source internet projects, and a $100 million science initiative for post‑Soviet researchers [1] [2] [4] [3]. These named programs and funding amounts are verifiable within the set of documents, but the sources do not supply consistent, comparable line-item totals necessary to declare which single programs or initiatives received the most funding overall.
7. Bottom line and recommended next step for anyone seeking a ranked list
The materials establish OSF’s major thematic priorities and cite several large, named grants, yet they do not provide the detailed grant-level accounting required to rank “most-funded” programs. For a definitive ranking, consult OSF’s full financial disclosures and annual reports (not included in these sources) to extract line-item grant totals and compare program budgets across years. Based strictly on the supplied documents, the most that can be stated with evidence is which areas and notable grants were emphatically supported, not which single program topped OSF’s funding list [1] [2] [4] [3].