Were any government agencies involved in commissioning Fusion GPS's Russia-related research?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Available reporting shows no clear, direct government contract that commissioned Fusion GPS’s Russia-related research; instead, public accounts say Fusion was initially hired by the conservative Washington Free Beacon during the GOP primary and later by Perkins Coie on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC [1] [2] [3]. Congressional and media probes raised questions about contacts between Fusion contractors and DOJ/FBI figures and about whether Fusion’s work intersected with government investigations, but sources do not document a formal government agency commissioning the Russia research [4] [5] [6].
1. Who hired Fusion GPS to dig into Trump and Russia — private clients, not an agency
Multiple contemporaneous accounts name private political clients as the payers for Fusion GPS’s Trump–Russia project. The conservative Washington Free Beacon retained Fusion during the GOP primary to research Trump, and later Perkins Coie retained Fusion on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, which led to Christopher Steele’s engagement and the so‑called Steele dossier [1] [2] [3]. Those sources frame Fusion’s Russia work as client‑driven commercial research rather than a government commission [1] [2].
2. Government agencies appear as recipients or investigators, not as commissioning clients
Reporting and testimony show U.S. government agencies—chiefly the FBI and congressional committees—encountered Fusion‑related material and investigated its implications, but the record in these sources does not show the FBI, DOJ, or other agencies hired Fusion GPS to conduct the Russia research. Fusion founder Glenn Simpson told Senate investigators about voluntary sources and interactions with the FBI; separate Senate and Justice probes examined contacts linking Fusion contractors to DOJ or FBI officials [5] [4]. These accounts describe agency involvement in evaluating or receiving intelligence, not in commissioning the original research [5] [4].
3. Disputes and allegations—multiple perspectives in the public record
Republican lawmakers and witnesses have alleged deeper entanglements: for example, Sen. Chuck Grassley and others pushed inquiries into whether Fusion was acting as an unregistered foreign agent or had taken Russian‑linked money while compiling the dossier [7] [8]. Bill Browder has testified that Fusion received money tied to Russian interests around the same period [8]. Fusion and some news outlets, by contrast, have emphasized private political funding by the Free Beacon and then by the Clinton campaign/DNC through Perkins Coie, and Fusion has denied direct coordination with government entities in hiring Steele [1] [2] [6].
4. The Nellie Ohr/DOJ/FBI thread — raises questions but doesn’t prove a government commission
Senate Judiciary releases and committee materials highlight Nellie Ohr, a contractor linked to Fusion, and her husband Bruce Ohr’s DOJ role; these materials assert that Nellie Ohr contributed to the dossier and that there were communications between Fusion, DOJ, and media to amplify the FBI’s investigative steps [4]. Those documents allege problematic conduct and prompted calls for accountability, but the sources stop short of documenting a formal government contract for Fusion’s Russia research; they focus on influence, coordination, and alleged concealment [4].
5. What the reporting does not say — limits of available sources
Available sources do not mention any explicit government procurement or formal agency contract that tasked Fusion GPS to compile the Steele dossier or its Russia research (not found in current reporting). The sources document private payments, subsequent sharing of material with government investigators, and congressional probes into contacts and funding [1] [2] [3] [5] [4]. Claims that Fusion was “paid by the Russian government” are disputed in the record and form the subject of competing testimony and fact‑checking, with advocates like Bill Browder insisting such payments occurred and other analyses rejecting that finding or calling it contested [8].
6. Bottom line — private hires produced material that intersected with government probes
The most consistent account in the cited reporting is that Fusion GPS’s Russia‑focused work originated from private clients (the Free Beacon, then Perkins Coie representing Clinton/DNC), and that government agencies later received or reviewed Fusion/Steele material and opened—or expanded—investigations. Congressional inquiries and released internal documents allege problematic contacts between Fusion contractors and DOJ/FBI officials, but those sources do not document a government agency commissioning Fusion’s Russia research [1] [2] [3] [5] [4].