Which groups are against upusa?

1. Why the question is muddy — acronym confusion and competing targets

Multiple analyses show the core problem is ambiguous naming: one set of sources treats "UPUSA" as the United Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (a historical denomination), another set conflates UPU/UPUSA with the Universal Postal Union and critics of its postal remuneration rules, and a third thread appears to conflate UPUSA with TPUSA, a contemporary political group. The provided documents do not contain a single authoritative definition of "UPUSA," so any answer must map which entity the question intends. The historical church entry contains no documented opposition groups in the provided extract, while the UPU/UPUSA discussion centers on state and corporate opposition to postal terms, and the TPUSA materials document civic and professional pushback ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

2. Who opposed the Universal Postal Union terms — governments and industry pushed back

Several sources document organized opposition to the postal remuneration regime attributed to the UPU from governments and business groups, most notably actions during the Trump administration and vocal complaints from U.S. industry. The Trump administration formally announced withdrawal intentions over perceived unfairness favoring other countries, and trade and manufacturing associations and large logistics firms such as Amazon and the National Association of Manufacturers publicly argued the system distorted competition and enabled cheaper inbound shipping from countries like China. These interventions framed the terms as economic disadvantage and quality-control risks, prompting diplomatic and policy moves ^{[2] [6]}.

3. Who opposes TPUSA — academics, watchdogs, and some political actors

When the target is Turning Point USA (commonly TPUSA), the opposition is diverse and ideological: academic communities and free-speech advocates criticize projects like the Professor Watchlist for chilling academic freedom and enabling harassment, while medical and ethics experts and some mainstream journalists and watchdog organizations have accused the group of spreading disinformation—particularly on COVID-19 and election integrity. Parts of the Republican establishment have also expressed concern about TPUSA’s tactics and influence, signaling that opposition crosses traditional partisan lines and includes institutional actors worried about reputational and civic harms ^{[3] [4]}.

4. No clear opponents for the historical United Presbyterian Church in the U.S. — archival silence

The historical entry for the United Presbyterian Church in the United States of America (often abbreviated UPUSA in denominational histories) shows no explicit organized opposition in the provided source excerpt. The material focuses on formation and institutional history rather than contemporary conflict. Absence of documented opposition in the supplied analysis is not proof of universal acceptance historically, but within the curated documents there are no named groups “against” this church to cite ^[1].

5. How agendas and framing shape who is labeled “against” — read the politics

Across these strands, opposition is shaped by political and economic agendas: state actors and industry framed the postal-union dispute as economic fairness and sovereignty; academic and journalistic critics framed TPUSA opposition around academic freedom, public-health accuracy, and partisan tactics. Each side’s messaging reflects institutional interests—governments and corporations push regulatory and trade rationales, while civil-society critics emphasize civic norms and professional ethics. The analyses show these agendas clearly; assessing claims requires noting whether critics focus on policy outcomes, reputational harms, or ideological rivalry ^{[2] [3] [4] [5]}.

If you meant a specific organization by “UPUSA,” tell me which one (the United Presbyterian Church, the Universal Postal Union/UPU-related dispute, or TPUSA/Turning Point USA) and I will produce a focused, source-stamped list of groups and the evidence against them.