Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Does gun control actually reduce gun deaths that are not accidental

Checked on June 11, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The evidence strongly suggests that specific types of gun control measures can reduce non-accidental gun deaths. Studies show that universal background checks and laws preventing violent offenders from possessing guns can reduce homicide rates by 15-18% [1]. States with higher gun ownership consistently show higher homicide rates [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original question:

  • Defensive Gun Use (DGU) Statistics:
  • There are approximately 484,800 gun crimes versus only 70,040 defensive gun uses annually according to the National Crime Victimization Survey [3]
  • While some claim millions of defensive gun uses, Harvard and Stanford researchers estimate the number is closer to 100,000 annually [4]
  • Even researchers who originally estimated 1.5 million defensive gun uses don't claim these incidents saved lives [5]
  • Types of Gun Control Matter:
  • Laws focusing on WHO can access guns are more effective than restrictions on WHAT types of guns are available [1]
  • Specific measures like permit requirements and sales restrictions to violent offenders show measurable effectiveness [2]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The question itself contains an implicit assumption that gun control measures might not affect non-accidental deaths, which isn't supported by available research. Several groups benefit from different narratives:

  • Gun Rights Organizations benefit from promoting high defensive gun use statistics, though these numbers are heavily disputed by academic researchers [4]
  • Academic Institutions like Harvard, Stanford, and the Rand Corporation have consistently found that defensive gun use statistics are likely overestimated [4] [5]
  • Gun manufacturers benefit from promoting the narrative that more guns increase safety, despite research showing states with higher gun ownership have higher homicide rates [2]

The Rand Corporation's conclusion that evidence for defensive gun use reducing harm is "inconclusive" [5] stands in stark contrast to the more definitive evidence showing that certain gun control measures do reduce gun deaths [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What is the relationship between gun ownership rates and homicide rates across different countries?
Do background check laws effectively prevent gun violence and criminal gun acquisition?
How do assault weapon bans impact gun violence statistics in jurisdictions that implement them?
What role does mental health policy play in preventing gun violence compared to gun control measures?
Do concealed carry laws increase or decrease violent crime rates in communities?